Great work‑life balance, strong tech exposure, and supportive team, with scope to improve incentives - Recensione dipendente - Senior Data Scientist presso Leidos

4,0
24 apr 2026
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

Excellent work‑life balance with a stable and supportive working environment Strong scope of work, especially exposure to real‑time, meaningful data and large‑scale systems Good tech stack and opportunities to work on modern data platforms and analytics use cases Great team culture - collaborative, helpful, and knowledgeable colleagues Attractive benefits package, including: Medical insurance (with the option to add partners) Pension contributions up to 8% Referral bonus scheme

Svantaggi

Annual bonus / incentive scheme is not available to everyone; it seems limited to top performers only Overall lack of clarity on annual bonus eligibility and ranges Stock purchase scheme could be more competitive - currently limited to a 10% discount Would benefit from matching shares or complimentary shares, which are common in other tech‑focused organisations

Esplora altre recensioni su Leidos

5,0
7 mag 2026
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

Large companies. Willingness to work with you.

Svantaggi

Low paying. No hybrid opportunity

3,0
27 mag 2026
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

Leidos provides opportunities to work on complex government programs with meaningful technical challenges. Depending on the contract and team, there can be exposure to cloud infrastructure, cybersecurity, systems engineering, networking, and mission-focused work that is difficult to find elsewhere. The company also has a large footprint, so there may be internal opportunities for people who are able to navigate the organization.

Svantaggi

My experience was that the quality of management varied significantly by program. Communication around expectations, roles, and priorities was often inconsistent, and decisions that affected employees were not always explained clearly or handled in a transparent way. Work-life balance also depended heavily on local management. Flexibility that existed in practice could be changed quickly, and employees were sometimes left trying to reconcile changing expectations with existing workloads and personal obligations. In my view, the company would benefit from stronger oversight of program-level management decisions, especially where employee responsibilities, workplace flexibility, and performance feedback are concerned. I also found that technical decision-making was sometimes driven more by schedule pressure than by sound engineering judgment. On complex government programs, that can create unnecessary risk and frustration for employees who are trying to do things correctly.

Vedi recensioni per: Utile|Valutazione|Data|Tutto