Low pay, no remote work, micromanagement, compliance heavy - Recensione dipendente - Project Manager presso Leidos

2,0
22 mag 2026
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

The military personnel (customer) on site are professional and friendly. The Marines clearly communicate what they need. Most of the civilians are good as well and put effort into their jobs. It's a rare change to see government civilian employees who actually care about their roles.

Svantaggi

Context for this review is only the SMIT contract. I won't speak for Leidos at large as it is a huge company and work environments vary considerably depending on the customer engagement and location. Less than ideal environment with team in New Orleans. Micromanagement of employees while paying low salaries with substandard benefits. 5 days of in person attendance is required and getting remote work days is difficult. You are not supposed to leave your desk to take a walk or talk/network with people, while senior leadership is comfortable working from home. Some of this is driven by heavy handed government civilians who dislike the contractors but the management still has responsibility to provide cover for their employees. Pay and benefits are low and bonuses don't exist. The pay raise received after one year didn’t even cover inflation so I am currently making less in adjusted terms than when I started. If you try to negotiate, they make you talk to an HR person a thousand miles away who is the intermediary between you and the regional manager who makes the actual decision. Even the best healthcare plan offered is a high deductible type that covers very little. Expect to pay hundreds of dollars out of pocket for unexpected physician visits. It’s a salaried position on paper but functions more like an hourly role with ruthlessly enforced sign ins and outs. They track your time to the minute. None of this is disclosed in the interview process or job description. If you find a way to do your daily work in less time (make processes more efficient), they still demand you sit in the seat until you've fulfilled your "shift." No getting off early Fridays and they still make you come into the office on the days military/Federal civilians are off when there is zero work to do. Most employees are underutilized and sitting at their desks concealing that they are staring at their phones, watching a show, or reading a book. There is a lack of interest in learning and new tools or working more efficiently is resisted. In 2026 when we are on the cusp of an AI singularity, most lack basic Excel/MS office skills let alone the ability to use of modern tools like AI, Tableau, automation software, etc. Any effort to improve processes is ignored.

Esplora altre recensioni su Leidos

5,0
15 mag 2026
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

Great culture, supportive management, encouragement for self development

Svantaggi

Some decisions move too slowly.

3,0
27 mag 2026
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

Leidos provides opportunities to work on complex government programs with meaningful technical challenges. Depending on the contract and team, there can be exposure to cloud infrastructure, cybersecurity, systems engineering, networking, and mission-focused work that is difficult to find elsewhere. The company also has a large footprint, so there may be internal opportunities for people who are able to navigate the organization.

Svantaggi

My experience was that the quality of management varied significantly by program. Communication around expectations, roles, and priorities was often inconsistent, and decisions that affected employees were not always explained clearly or handled in a transparent way. Work-life balance also depended heavily on local management. Flexibility that existed in practice could be changed quickly, and employees were sometimes left trying to reconcile changing expectations with existing workloads and personal obligations. In my view, the company would benefit from stronger oversight of program-level management decisions, especially where employee responsibilities, workplace flexibility, and performance feedback are concerned. I also found that technical decision-making was sometimes driven more by schedule pressure than by sound engineering judgment. On complex government programs, that can create unnecessary risk and frustration for employees who are trying to do things correctly.

Vedi recensioni per: Utile|Valutazione|Data|Tutto