Inexperienced folks with rapidly shifting views - Recensione dipendente - Dipendente anonimo presso MINT

1,0
5 gen 2026
Dipendente anonimo
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

Young, fast-paced and informal environment!

Svantaggi

Over the past three years, the product has undergone several major changes, alongside frequent shifts in management, product direction, and the overall vision regarding people and performance. Individuals can move very quickly from being considered central contributors to being labelled as low performers, often without clear or substantiated reasoning. There is a general lack of transparency in decision-making processes. Leads are not consistently put in a position to effectively act as people managers, while continuous budget cuts further limit their ability to support and develop their teams. Throughout this time, I have never received structured feedback nor clear communication regarding career opportunities or progression. Despite previously receiving very positive evaluations, I was reclassified as a low performer within 15 days, immediately following my manager’s resignation, without any concrete explanation or supporting evidence. As a result, my former manager was unable to support or advocate for me, leaving me in a situation that had a severe emotional impact.

Esplora altre recensioni su MINT

4,0
25 mar 2026
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

Integrazione tecnologica moderna con strumenti basati sull'intelligenza artificiale.

Svantaggi

L'azienda ha un elevato turnover del personale.

2,0
15 lug 2025
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

- Skilled and supportive frontend and backend leads - Modern and regularly updated tech stack - Friendly and professional Engineering team

Svantaggi

- In my experience, salary payments were sometimes delayed, which affected team morale - layoffs, including experienced developers and QA engineers - Frequent team reshuffling created a sense of instability - Requirements were often unclear or incomplete, making development harder than it needed to be - The QA team seemed understaffed, which slowed down the testing process - Planning often changed shortly before or during the sprint - Company meetings mentioned business growth and new clients, which felt inconsistent with the reductions in staff - I didn’t see a clearly defined career path or structured approach to salary reviews - If you're looking for a stable workplace and want to feel secure for at least a year or two - I’d strongly recommend avoiding this company. If you're looking for a place with a great dev team and modern tech, this company has that. But if stability, long-term planning, and clear direction are important to you, it might be worth exploring other options.

2
Vedi recensioni per: Utile|Valutazione|Data|Tutto