Terrible Place to Work - Recensione dipendente - Data Scientist presso Mastercard

2,0
24 giu 2018
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

Very interesting data, little else

Svantaggi

Strongly encourage anyone with integrity, talent and ambition NOT to work at Mastercard, especially if you are in mid/career and/or work in technology. The company is a marketing company that has taken on the veneer of tech company and struggles to keep pace with the state-of-the-state in AI/ML/Data Science. The data can be fascinating, but Advisors is little more than a back office and reporting shop and its choke hold on analytics functions prevents other teams from building competencies in Data Science.

avatar
Risposta di Mastercard
7y
Thank you for your review. We’d like an opportunity to respond as employee satisfaction is critical to our success. As you know, technology is the core of our business. We have very strong resources in the AI/ML/Data Science arena as we recently acquired an award winning Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning company that does just that. We are confident in the abilities of those in our new team and feel they add strong value to Mastercard’s robust existing suite of AI-based products and offerings.

Esplora altre recensioni su Mastercard

5,0
24 mag 2026
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

Great culture. Stable. Analytical and rewarding if you find the right product.

Svantaggi

Slower career growth. Not as influential

4,0
27 mag 2026
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

Mastercard does a great job fostering an inclusive and supportive environment. There are genuinely good people throughout the organization, and leadership often invests in employee engagement through events, recognition, and culture-building initiatives. I enjoyed many of the relationships I built while working there, and there are teams that truly care about collaboration and supporting one another.

Svantaggi

Compensation at the director level did not feel competitive compared to the level of responsibility expected. Career advancement can also be extremely challenging due to how top-heavy the organization is with senior leadership roles. There are a large number of Senior Vice Presidents, sometimes without clear scope or experience aligned to the title, which creates limited room for high-performing employees to grow. At times, it felt like senior leaders were being hired primarily to manage or communicate with other senior leaders, rather than drive meaningful operational impact. In product and go-to-market roles especially, priorities are often heavily driven by funding decisions. It can be frustrating when projects suddenly shift in importance or remain underfunded for long periods of time while awaiting senior leadership review. This sometimes leaves highly talented employees in limbo, unable to move initiatives forward despite strong momentum or market opportunity. The organization can also be very comfortable with the status quo, which creates a slower pace that many employees seem accustomed to. For people who are highly motivated and eager to drive change, it can feel difficult to navigate the number of roadblocks and layers of approval required to move initiatives forward.

Vedi recensioni per: Utile|Valutazione|Data|Tutto