Mediocre organization; avoid if you can. - Recensione dipendente - Manager, Business Development presso Mastercard

1,0
9 ago 2021
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

1. Benefits and work-life balance 2. Learning courses and modules

Svantaggi

1. Work is mediocre. At a broader level, the company claims it's a Tech company, however, it is absolutely not a Tech company. It is a payments processor/ infrastructure company. That's it. At an individual level, most of your time will be spent on operational, mundane, basic data analysis, and process related tasks. India offices are their official Center of Excellence (read: back offices). You are merely a resource working on menial tasks (monkey work) for the teams in US. You will not learn anything on the job. 2. No job parity. There is no parity in designation across levels. It is just amusing (and shocking at the same time) how an employee with similar years of work experience and same/ better pedigree can be 2 or 3 levels in designation below another employee. 3. Hiring processes are slow, outdated, and sometimes deceitful. For many mediocre roles, I have personally seen job advertisements that were highly polished up to attract strong or over-qualified candidates.

Esplora altre recensioni su Mastercard

5,0
23 giu 2026
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

People are highly intelligent and things seem to operate efficiently

Svantaggi

Large ship so changes are hard to make

4,0
27 mag 2026
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

Mastercard does a great job fostering an inclusive and supportive environment. There are genuinely good people throughout the organization, and leadership often invests in employee engagement through events, recognition, and culture-building initiatives. I enjoyed many of the relationships I built while working there, and there are teams that truly care about collaboration and supporting one another.

Svantaggi

Compensation at the director level did not feel competitive compared to the level of responsibility expected. Career advancement can also be extremely challenging due to how top-heavy the organization is with senior leadership roles. There are a large number of Senior Vice Presidents, sometimes without clear scope or experience aligned to the title, which creates limited room for high-performing employees to grow. At times, it felt like senior leaders were being hired primarily to manage or communicate with other senior leaders, rather than drive meaningful operational impact. In product and go-to-market roles especially, priorities are often heavily driven by funding decisions. It can be frustrating when projects suddenly shift in importance or remain underfunded for long periods of time while awaiting senior leadership review. This sometimes leaves highly talented employees in limbo, unable to move initiatives forward despite strong momentum or market opportunity. The organization can also be very comfortable with the status quo, which creates a slower pace that many employees seem accustomed to. For people who are highly motivated and eager to drive change, it can feel difficult to navigate the number of roadblocks and layers of approval required to move initiatives forward.

Vedi recensioni per: Utile|Valutazione|Data|Tutto