Good Company, Horrible Leadership - Recensione dipendente - Senior Business Process Consultant presso McKesson

2,0
8 feb 2025
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

- Good Health Benefits and employee incentive programs. - ESPP is very competitive and with a substantial discount. - The main HQ office is new and refreshed, with good on-site amenities. - Flexible work options and good WFH policy

Svantaggi

- Mediocre pay - Toxic, micromanaging leadership. Perfect embodiment of the Peter Principle. - Leadership does not live up to the McKesson Values, initiates highly inappropriate workplace discussions, and WILL retaliate against you for speaking up with concerns - - by PIPing you over non-quantitative and highly-subjective performance metrics never previously discussed. - After failure to overcome said PIP and termination, McKesson fights you tooth and nail for any unemployment claim and will characterize the reason for your termination as due to employee misconduct.

avatar
Risposta di McKesson
1y
We appreciate your candid review and are sorry to hear about your dissatisfaction. Our team is dedicated to fostering a positive and supportive work environment, and we take your comments seriously.

Esplora altre recensioni su McKesson

5,0
18 mag 2026
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

Career verticals through Operations and Sales in healthcare

Svantaggi

Connecting to adjacent teams or larger groups within the org

1,0
3 giu 2026
Dipendente anonimo
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

1. relatively aloof culture for ICs to grow on their own 2. on and off few people are good 3. Actually consultants in india are better than some full time hires to work with. The h1bs in full time roles and some GCs/Americans are just 1 step away from unemployment line but there are some good quality consultants who can be directed well to bring in good work. Problem is lack of direction when middle management is just running after money.

Svantaggi

1. top most management is clueless to what is going post the middle tier 2. middle tiers - VPs/SVPs/Directors and Sr. Directors are among the worst. Mostly cast offs from Consulting firms/Tech cos/Other Healthcare firms, this group has some of the worst, clueless folks who just think very narrowly about how to get rid of problems, maybe craft a story for higher ups. Get rid of this layer ( so called people management ) and co. could shine better on the work of ICs, decent software engineers and regular rank and file. 3. Main money maker distribution is different from tech group and the IT here is almost comical - 2 years ago in 2024 there were "directors" bringing AI agents with 90% hallucination .. I mean that has got to be an industry first!

1
avatar
Risposta di McKesson
5d
Thank you for bringing these issues to our attention. We are committed to creating a positive work environment and are disappointed to learn that we fell short. We are taking your feedback seriously and are making efforts to address the concerns raised. Please feel free to reach out for a more in-depth discussion.
Vedi recensioni per: Utile|Valutazione|Data|Tutto