Progress hindered by leadership - Recensione dipendente - Dipendente anonimo presso Medium

2,0
2 ott 2020
Dipendente anonimo
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

- Interesting company mission - Egalitarian mindset towards publishing - Warm office culture - Smooth and organized interview and onboarding process. - Unlimited PTO - High quality, talented staffers

Svantaggi

- Leadership suffers from an echo chamber due to a culture of acquiescence. A higher value is placed on puffery and yesmanship, over innovation and leadership. This value system is directly attributed towards the company's lack of progress, as well as to the company's inability to retain innovative and talented staff. - There's a lack of collaboration and trust between upper and middle management. Leadership tends to micromanage, as well as underutilizing middle management's understanding of process, progress, and timelines. A ripple effect that creates a number of missed opportunities and uninformed top-down decision making. - Leadership struggles with DEI at fundamental level. Although DEI has been proven to have an overwhelmingly positive impact, the company has not learned to harness and optimize. Deep down, leadership fears diversity and "social justice" efforts, yet opts for a move performative, superficial displays of allyship. - The company structure favors and promotes white men. White men tend to fail up, passing over talented, high-performers who inevitably leave the company, taking their skills to our competitors. - Leadership is mostly white and male which makes clear that "just winging it" is ripe with un/conscious bias. Recruiting and HR can only go so far. Change needs to start at the top. - The company tends to place the blame of attrition on the unmatched, unlimited resources for our competitors. The reality is the company's mission and culture attract talented employees, only to lose those employees to a retention funnel that values qualities antithetical to our success.

Esplora altre recensioni su Medium

5,0
7 ago 2025
Dipendente anonimo
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

Small teams, engineering driven Supportive, kind coworkers Fun offsites

Svantaggi

Chaotic roadmaps with lack of focus and long term commitment

2,0
9 mar 2025
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

Previously a great community. Some good writers. Good UX.

Svantaggi

Huge pay cut January 2025, with 'hidden' reason (which was a decision to cut money to most writers). Nomination team and publication owners completely in the dark about decision to cut pay to writers Writers in the dark constantly emailing and asking what's going on. It was a horrible situation. Currently a mass exodus to Substack, with writers fed up and angry. Curation Team members are in the dark about how hard it is to be a nominator, but there's NO conversation between Curation Team and Nomination Team. One Curation team member was in the Medium Slack channel and was very defensive of the Medium team. Curation Team gets paid for their work. Nomination Team and pub editors may not get paid, but will work anyway and put work forward to try to get it boosted. Pub editors are doing a lot of free work and resentful. Culture of 'secrecy' and hierarchy is unhealthy. Why aren't the contract employees doing boost nomination invited to participate at offsites? Always feel like Medium is looking for ways to take any money away from writers they can. Medium may have a vision, but if they do, they aren't sharing it. It feels like an exclusive club and an us vs. them culture. Writers on Medium are not valued now. Some writers using AI have been paid thousands of dollars and chosen for features in the Staff Picks. Pubs are currently losing strength, and pub owners are disheartened and miserable.

Vedi recensioni per: Utile|Valutazione|Data|Tutto