Good till I got laid off - Recensione dipendente - Assurance Staff presso Moss Adams LLP

4,0
21 apr 2025
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

-Pay is great and competitive -People are friendly for the most part

Svantaggi

-Some seniors can be really rough to work with, they do not know how to work with staff and seems like Moss lacks training on this. -Long hours -Management spread the word that they dont do layoffs at all, and that job is secure because partners took paycuts instead during covid, but still ended up doing layoffs

Esplora altre recensioni su Moss Adams LLP

5,0
1 giu 2026
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

Great office and great folks to work with.

Svantaggi

Lower pay than industry standard

2,0
6 gen 2026
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

About the only pros I see from this company was remote work and benefits. You did have some good employees.

Svantaggi

The organization struggles with significant management and cultural issues despite stated diversity commitments. While diversity initiatives exist, they have inadvertently created siloed groups that prioritize in-group interests over collaborative team culture. Reports to HR and anonymous reporting channels regarding discrimination and workplace concerns often went unaddressed, undermining trust in leadership. Substantial disparities exist in how different teams are treated. International team members, particularly those in India, face excessive workload expectations—regularly working 12+ hour days, extending until midnight or 1 AM US time. This creates an unsustainable and inequitable work environment. Leadership has not been transparent about offshoring strategies. While the company denied plans to move work overseas, Indian team members received extensive training while US-based employees did not, suggesting contradictory long-term planning. Recent layoffs have raised questions about decision-making criteria, with highly skilled contributors, and just good people over all being let go while some underperformers and rude, bad leaders were retained, potentially due to favoritism within management cliques. The company's stated values around diversity and inclusion are not reflected in day-to-day operations or management decisions. Significant improvement is needed in leadership accountability, equitable treatment across all locations, and transparent communication about business strategy.

Vedi recensioni per: Utile|Valutazione|Data|Tutto