employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Multnomah County Library

Questa è la tua azienda?

Not a living wage for Portland, OR. - Recensione dipendente - Library Assistant presso Multnomah County Library

3,0
30 lug 2024
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

Lots of books, Great, helpful, knowledgeable teammates, Meaningful, varied, and mostly fulfilling work. Mostly great patrons. Part time work available.

Svantaggi

Low pay for experience/skills required, Out of touch/remote administration values conformity and control over collaboration and creativity. (See: giant bureaucracy.) Though starting pay is better than other local library systems, still does not pay front line staff a living wage for the local economy, and on call employees are paid less than their experience level merits. Like teachers and nurses, front-line library employees are in the "prestige/meaning" bind, which weaponizes the desire to be of service to get more work for less pay than many other professions, Compensation has NOT kept up with the stunning post pandemic rise in mental health incidents faced by branch employees. Employees now expected to provide social work as well as all library tasks. Library system now hires fewer librarians and have lower-paid employees do most of their work. (And only 3 states in the US pay librarians a living wage...) The organization profits off of part time workers. Part time workers pay 4x what full-time workers pay for insurance, and yet there are exponentially fewer full time positions.

Esplora altre recensioni su Multnomah County Library

5,0
27 apr 2026
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

-Great people to work with -great environment

Svantaggi

None noticed. Great place to work

1,0
28 ott 2025
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

Flexibility is the only pro. (That and meaningful work/great colleagues--this is how they get you.) They do offer part time positions, but benefit costs are ratcheted up to double and quadruple what full-time workers pay--and yet it seems the majority of posts are mandatory part time, despite branches needing help. When one branch was insanely understaffed for more than a year during the pandemic, several interviewed, vetted candidates turned down positions because they would only offer them part time hours & unaffordable benefit payments. (ACA costs less, but you can't get it while working there...) Another pro: running across books like "Work Wont' Love you Back" that detail the exploitative nature of the non-profit sector and 'prestige' jobs like libraries, teaching, nursing, and how they weaponize our desire to serve. SIGH.

Svantaggi

If it's not, it should be illegal to pay on-call employees the same hourly rate (with NO real benefits) as regular employees. This means 30-40% LESS compensation for trained, experienced, vetted employees who show up to keep branches open. Nobody, including the union, wants to talk about it. "Its better than it was." doesn't mean it's not still exploitative. $1.50 an hr "in lieu of benefits" and some sick leave. One can be on a long-term temporary posting at a branch--showing up and being an integral part of the team-- and be the only person going unpaid for major holidays. In what universe is that equitable? Also, major lack of transparency around benefits and options. You have to ask, and you have to be specific, or you have to comb through a messy, ambiguous contract. These things should simply be clearly posted. Lack of respect, fair benefits policies, transparency, appreciation and opportunities to move up make this a dead-end job or just a stopping place.

2
Vedi recensioni per: Utile|Valutazione|Data|Tutto