Good benefits... and that's about it - Recensione dipendente - Software Engineer presso NASK

1,0
10 ago 2018
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

The company offers good benefits, which is why most people stay as long as they do. The management style is very laid-back, which is nice if you want to just do your own thing and be left alone. However, this causes a lot of problems as well.

Svantaggi

The culture of the company is stressed during interviews, but you will find out quickly the company has no culture. I believe this is made worse by the poor leadership and management. The President is an engineer himself and does not seem to know how to run a company and hires others in the management level who are okay with that status quo. There is no real opportunity for growth with the company. You are told what project you will work on and your input isn't really requested or desired. The company does not innovate any more. Their growth has been stagnant for years and it appears they're not capable of priming contracts. They only really pursue subcontract work and 80% of their work is through one prime... They used to focus on hiring the best talent but have shifted to hiring cheaper, younger engineers with little experience or older engineers who have dated knowledge and don't bring anything innovative to the table. Things are very disorganized and dysfunctional in both the engineering and the admin teams. There is no communication of plans or visions for the company to employees. While everyone should have a vested interest in the company doing well, really no one's opinion matters besides the owner.

Esplora altre recensioni su NASK

5,0
2 feb 2026
Dipendente anonimo
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

Excellent leadership, culture, interesting work, and work-life balance.

Svantaggi

No cons at this time.

2,0
23 gen 2025
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

They have good pay and benefits

Svantaggi

Unprepared Work Environment: I was routinely set up for failure in my assigned tasks due to inadequate preparation and resources. The lab space I was asked to use for testing flight hardware was filthy, failed to meet basic aerospace standards, and was an embarrassment when briefing customers. It had been this way for years. No Investment in Employee Development: Efforts to proactively train on necessary tools and skills were dismissed until deadlines were missed and schedules were delayed. I had proposed learning a critical simulation tool weeks ahead of a major project but was told it wasn’t important. When the project inevitably fell behind, another engineer was rushed to learn the same tool under pressure. Alarming Work Practices: Management turns a blind eye to employees working over 90-hour weeks, prioritizing immediate deadlines over employee well-being. This culture of burnout and neglect contributed to an abnormally high turnover rate. In just one year, 90% of my team left the company, a clear sign of systemic issues.

1
Vedi recensioni per: Utile|Valutazione|Data|Tutto