employer cover photo

Naval Audit Service

Questa è la tua azienda?

1 Star, Would Not Recommend - Recensione dipendente - Senior Auditor presso Naval Audit Service

1,0
6 mag 2026
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

Reputation for Good Auditors and training.

Svantaggi

No longer trains Auditors. No common sense decisions can be made without SES approval. If you have COVID, you must take leave , without the option to telework. Rumors of investigations, loyalty test, and backstabbing among leadership. Would not recommend.

Esplora altre recensioni su Naval Audit Service

5,0
19 mar 2021
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

Nice coworkers, flexible work schedules, time allowed for physical fitness, management has really tried to improve transparency and provide good programs to employees

Svantaggi

Potential budget cuts (hopefully they don't actually happen) That's the only con I have.

1,0
5 mar 2024
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

Auditors from NAS are known for their thoroughness and attention to detail, which ensures the accuracy and reliability of their findings.

Svantaggi

As a former auditor with the Naval Audit Service, I must express my profound disappointment and frustration with the organization's systemic failures and shortcomings. My experience working within this agency has been nothing short of disheartening, and I feel compelled to share my grievances to shed light on the dire need for reform. First and foremost, the Naval Audit Service has consistently failed to uphold its mandate of ensuring accountability and efficiency within the Navy. Reports from the Department of Defense Inspector General have highlighted numerous instances of mismanagement, waste, and ineffectiveness within the organization. These reports reveal a pattern of negligence and incompetence that permeates the senior-most leadership of the Naval Audit Service, ultimately undermining its ability to fulfill its critical mission. One of the most glaring issues plaguing the Naval Audit Service is its chronic lack of transparency and accountability. Audits routinely take between one and two years to complete due to insufficient staffing levels. Some audit teams only have two auditors to manage an audit that reaches across the Navy. By the time audits are completed, management has already corrected the issues. Yet, when the auditors ask for additional hiring actions to fill their ranks, the hiring managers point blame at other agencies, when in essence it’s that they don’t know how to do their job. Moreover, the Naval Audit Service has failed to adapt to the evolving needs and challenges facing the Navy in 2024. Despite the increasing complexity of naval operations and the growing demand for rigorous oversight, the organization has remained stagnant and resistant to change. Anyone that has a new idea is disregarded, stalled, or flatly told “no”. This failure to innovate and evolve has left the Naval Audit Service ill-equipped to address emerging threats and vulnerabilities, leaving the Navy vulnerable to exploitation and abuse. Furthermore, the Naval Audit Service has a long history of disregarding the well-being and professional development of its auditors. Reports of workplace harassment, discrimination, and retaliation have surfaced with alarming frequency, painting a grim picture of a toxic and hostile work environment. Auditors who dare to speak out against misconduct or advocate for reform are often ostracized and marginalized, effectively silencing dissent and perpetuating a culture of fear and intimidation. In conclusion, the Naval Audit Service is a deeply flawed and dysfunctional organization that has failed in its duty to uphold accountability and transparency within the Navy. From systemic mismanagement at the highest levels, to not innovating, to disregarding its employees, the organization's numerous shortcomings undermine its credibility, integrity, and ability to perform its mission.

3
Vedi recensioni per: Utile|Valutazione|Data|Tutto