One of the worst companies I worked for in my life, see my comments before - Recensione dipendente - Senior Software Engineer presso Netcracker Technology

1,0
24 mar 2023
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

Nothing to like here in my 7 months.

Svantaggi

Worst management, let me clear one thing this is not at all product based company. You have to again needs to attain the interview post to join the company if you were unable to clear the client rounds then they might call you and say goodbye. I had joined with 2 of my old friends, they initially fired them because no proper project matches their profile and I had a major accident and went for 3 weeks' leave then back to work but they suddenly call me and said they have no project so they are going to release me from the company. One of the worst person is the Bangalore Head (LS), he will not bother about you like you are an asset for the company or a family person he just used his power and fired you on call. Please note this point before joining this company, I did a big mistake in my life by joined ->You have to attain the client interview post join and their major clients are Vodafone & TMobile, you have to clear client rounds to get the project so this is not at all a product-based company. ->All the projects are very old tech stack, as they are in the telecom domain so have the custom framework, now market moved to microservices, cloud, and DevOps but they are still on the old bus to take the war and deploy to tomcat server, you will go backward once start working on projects. ->Most of the time you have to work with Russian people and you know how they treat you. ->Managars are saving their job and doing nothing just putting an arrow on you. ->The Bangalore head(LS) is the worst person, he will never understand your situation like how is your work going on and all, he will call you and say we are releasing you as your work is not important to us. ->No backup projects for resources, if you lost the project then lost your job. ->No learning, no career growth, no proper project, no work-life balance, management is not ready to listen to your problem, ->First they should release the Head of the company (LS) to maintain a normal office environment. ->Last but not least, if you are good then the company is good, but if there is an emergency then how the company would treat you is that important. I went for major surgery and back to work after 15 days but they were not ready to listen to my word and just say goodbye because of no project, how it is possible god knows.

avatar
Risposta di Netcracker Technology
3y
Thanks for taking the time to write about your experience working at Netcracker. We are sorry to see we've missed the mark from your experience. Authentic insights around both Pros and Cons help job seekers and employees understand what it’s truly like to work at a company and we acknowledge the thought and candidness you took in sharing your review. We are increasing our focus on strengthening leader communication and employee engagement opportunities so that all team members can continue to feel empowered to do their best work and feel they belong and matter here. Thanks again.

Esplora altre recensioni su Netcracker Technology

5,0
17 ott 2024
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

good team, good management, interesting projects

Svantaggi

sometimes too many business trips

4,0
8 dic 2025
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

Some historical context to start with. NetCracker was built by some of the brightest graduates of its time. It used to be an extremely successful scale-up because of a combination of two factors: 1. The right moment and place: a wealthy and fast-growing telco industry needed a fresh start in their systems to roll out the infrastructure the world is using today. 2. A business model based on consultancy-style principles: hire talented graduates and unsettled perfectionists, pay them pennies, work them to death, and make a reasonable margin because of that. It worked really well. And then they lost it all due to classic leadership failures and star syndrome. Key reasons to choose NetCracker: You will meet some of the most brilliant people here and make friends for life. You will learn how to make impossible things possible, and you will learn rigorous delivery frameworks executed at a level very few companies and people in the world can match. You will also learn team-based brainstorming of subtle and bold political maneuvering. And many other advanced skills you will probably never need anywhere else. This company truly values outcomes and those who can deliver. Their survival depends on execution, so high achievers have always been valued and quickly promoted. However...

Svantaggi

Number one bad thing you need to know (beyond working unreasonable hours for decades and learning non-transferable skills): There is a caste system. If you are 'delivery', you will never be admitted into the higher caste of western office decision makers, nor will you ever be equally paid. They will work you to death, promote you into even more impossible missions, but will never consider you at the same level, despite you owning the entire delivery process (revenue generation!) and managing teams of hundreds of people. NC operate in a highly chaotic and politically heavy environments of impossible transformation programs. They frequently commit to delivering programs that cannot be delivered, so they burn their high achievers to exhaustion and then praise a caste of politically savvy, non-tech 'managers' whose main role is not delivery but navigating the heavy corporate games of dinosaur-like or inertias telcos without any measurable outcomes. NC charge clients for software implementation, they pay you like you are doing some leisure product development, but in reality, company and tech teams at the forefront are driving painful full-scale transformations for which western-world consultants would charge $ thousands per hour. Ever heard of leadership skills? Forget about it. The entire leadership vertical has none, and no intention to develop any. (On the senior management level think of micromanagement, lack of EQ, team dysfunctions, lack of transparency, favoritism and all other toxic traits of poor leadership). Heard of things like QBRs, strategy planning, OKRs, etc.? Non-existent. Real program management or portfolio management? Non-existent. The entire workforce outside of Boston is treated like a body shop. No transparency of the company strategy. It’s both: there is no comprehensive strategy planning in place and a 'none of your business' attitude. The so-called department managers also have zero general management skills. No understanding of how to direct, plan, or execute strategy. And 90% of them don’t possess even basic people-management skills.

Vedi recensioni per: Utile|Valutazione|Data|Tutto