Great company, but refuses to adapt - Recensione dipendente - Manager presso PACCAR

3,0
12 lug 2021
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

Decent work-life balance depending on your salary grade level Prioritize internal employees for promotions over hiring external candidates Opportunity for advancement if you want it and do well in your role Tuition reimbursement benefits Great colleagues

Svantaggi

Lower than market average pay for job roles. Slow to respond to COVID and provided very little support with WFH, but required managers to inspect employees work from home set-ups via teams. Response to COVID was perceived that there is little care about employees with strong encouragement to be at the office while not actually required. Unofficially required manager level and up to be at the office as of July 2020. As of August 2021 requiring employees to be back to work 100% with an option for an exception to be signed off by Senior Management only for employees with no direct reports for 1 day a week at home, but can only be a Tuesday, Wednesday, or Thursday, with many other contingencies. Lean company, which has proven successful, but also limits the ability to invest in systematic and forward-looking improvements as well as proportionate head-count to company demands and growth.

Esplora altre recensioni su PACCAR

5,0
18 dic 2025
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

Lot of opportunities within organization

Svantaggi

Less opportunity for flexible working hours

1,0
15 apr 2026
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

Not much, if you want a place that's okay with mediocrity, then welcome.

Svantaggi

They blindly follow industry trends not industry standards. We have an initiative to use AI to increase productivity, without a proper plan, without security in mind and lack of general understanding. Consistently understaffed, for example there are teams or parts if teams that have max 4 developer type roles with 36 apps or APIs to support - this has lead to inconsistent code and effort as employees are spread too thin to be able to deliver quality work. Management refuses to take responsibility for issues that arise from being understaffed. Teams are not consistent in what tools and pipelines are used causing even more confusion and delays. Double standards: they don't want to properly promote or give raises to hard workers. Upper management made it clear to direct managers that "meets expectations" was a fine thing to give... To employees doing more than their fair share of work and are doing work outside of their role since they have no one else to do it do to being understaffed.

3
Vedi recensioni per: Utile|Valutazione|Data|Tutto