PepsiCo, good place to work - Recensione dipendente - SAP Analyst/Training Coordinator presso PepsiCo

5,0
22 ago 2008
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

Pepsico is a great company and is pretty stable. There are many opportunities for employees to grow. The company has some pretty good benefits such as flexible work arrangements and provides employees to select a "one simple thing" in their objectives to support their work life balance. You va the opportunity to work from home when necessary. PepsiCo divisions also offer Summer hours which are just awesome.

Svantaggi

Really bad HR system, especially for those who apply online. I don't like the Sharepower program where the company give you stocks every year depending on your job level. You will have to wait a very long time before you can actually cash it in because you only get the profit out of selling the stocks minus all the taxes and fees.

Esplora altre recensioni su PepsiCo

5,0
15 mag 2026
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

Solid structure, goals are attainable, strong leadership.

Svantaggi

Fortune 50 company comes with restructuring and potential employees headcount resizing.

4,0
6 mag 2026
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

Worked for PepsiCo for 10 years across four locations in Pennsylvania, Delaware, and Florida. Gained experience in multiple sales and operational roles while supporting account growth, merchandising, and customer relationships. Florida locations were especially well-operated and efficient. PepsiCo provided competitive pay, solid benefits through Keystone, and a good vacation package compared to competitors in the beverage industry. The company also offered strong sales incentive programs, earning rewards such as Orlando Magic floor seats, Pro Bowl tickets, Apple Watches, and Yeti cups for exceeding performance goals and driving sales results.

Svantaggi

While PepsiCo promotes internal growth opportunities, many promotions and leadership opportunities appeared to favor college internship hires over long-term internal employees. In some cases, newer college-based management pushed corporate initiatives without fully understanding local market realities or account volume trends. For example, innovation products were sometimes forced into low-volume accounts where sell-through was unrealistic. Operationally, certain delivery processes could be improved, particularly with Tropicana products being stored in coolers on trucks for extended periods, which could impact product quality and increase waste. Work-life balance could also be challenging, as sales representatives commonly worked 50–60 hour weeks. Expectations from corporate leadership were often unrealistic, especially when customer representatives and drivers were expected to fully stock stores while servicing 15+ accounts per day. Experiences could also vary depending on whether locations were union or non-union operated.

Vedi recensioni per: Utile|Valutazione|Data|Tutto