All spin, weak leadership and worse culture - Recensione dipendente - Dipendente anonimo presso Re-engage

1,0
12 apr 2026
Dipendente anonimo
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

The people on the ground. Volunteers and frontline staff are genuinely kind and committed, and the older people supported by the charity are a pleasure to work with.

Svantaggi

Working here was honestly the worst experience of my professional life. This review cannot do my experience justice but it should paint somewhat of a picture. Having read the other negative reviews, I can say they are completely accurate and reflect my experience. It is validating to see I was not the only one, but also genuinely sad that nothing seems to have changed and others have also experienced such poor treatment. I regret ever working for this organisation, but I am very glad I left. In my experience, there was bullying from senior management. I do not say that lightly, but it is how I experienced it. I also heard senior leaders speak very badly and unprofessionally about people they had pushed out, which says a lot about the culture. There was a strong sense of narrative control, and at times behaviour that felt intimidating. Concerns were not addressed in a meaningful way, they were shut down or redirected. As others have said, there was no proper HR function. If you had concerns, you were effectively left dealing with the same senior leadership responsible for the issues, including individuals who, in my experience, could be dismissive, rude and unprofessional. Leadership more broadly is a real issue. There is a noticeable lack of meaningful experience in key roles, and it shows in both decision making and culture. One senior manager in particular seems to approach the charity like a sales floor, which may reflect their background, but completely misses the point of a people-focused organisation. There is a heavy focus on optics and self-promotion, and far less on creating a genuinely healthy working environment. The drive of senior leadership in my opinion is money generated, they didn’t ever seem motivated or engaged with the older people at the centre of the cause. I have seen comments about senior management enjoying certain perks. I cannot personally confirm that, but based on how people were treated and they’re behaviour/ character, it would not surprise me at all. It is also worth saying that writing a negative review like this is not something people do lightly. Whether current or former employees, there is always a concern about repercussions, especially in an environment where people already feel uncomfortable/ fearful of speaking up. The consistency across reviews should not be dismissed. What makes it worse is how this culture is upheld. There are middle managers who seem more focused on backing senior leadership than supporting their teams. The previous review is a good example of this. It reads less like an honest reflection and more like a defence. When someone spends more time dismissing others and calling them liars than offering anything genuinely substantively positive, it does not disprove the criticism, it reinforces it. And on that point, if you repeatedly hear senior leaders speak negatively about people who have left, it starts to feel a bit like the classic situation where someone claims all of their exes were “the problem or crazy.” At some point, you have to question the pattern… Overall, it is a huge shame. The older people the charity supports are wonderful, and many of the volunteers and frontline staff are some of the loveliest people I have worked with. I miss some of them, and I am proud of the work I tried to do there, especially knowing how much that support is needed. But there is no part of me that could have continued working there. I am genuinely embarrassed to have been associated with the organisation, although I am not embarrassed by what I personally contributed. If you are thinking of working here, take the reviews seriously. If you already work here and are questioning things, trust your instincts. There are far better, healthier organisations out there. The issue here is not the criticism of Re-engage SLT/ the CEO, it us their complete lack of willingness to acknowledge it.

Esplora altre recensioni su Re-engage

1,0
31 mag 2023
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

Working at Re-engage has been a rollercoaster experience, with both positive and negative aspects that are important to highlight. While the front line staff deserves commendation for their dedication to the elderly community, the toxic leadership within senior management tarnishes the overall work environment. The frontline staff at Re-engage exemplifies professionalism, empathy, and a genuine commitment to the charity's mission. Their unwavering support for the elderly and tireless efforts to improve their quality of life are truly inspiring. The compassion and care demonstrated by these individuals should be commended.

Svantaggi

Title: Mixed Bag at Re-engage: Toxic Leadership Shadows a Dedicated Frontline Team Rating: ★★☆☆☆ Review: Working at Re-engage has been a rollercoaster experience, with both positive and negative aspects that are important to highlight. While the front line staff deserves commendation for their dedication to the elderly community, the toxic leadership within senior management tarnishes the overall work environment. The frontline staff at Re-engage exemplifies professionalism, empathy, and a genuine commitment to the charity's mission. Their unwavering support for the elderly and tireless efforts to improve their quality of life are truly inspiring. The compassion and care demonstrated by these individuals should be commended. However, behind the scenes, the toxic leadership within senior management casts a dark cloud over the organization. The senior management's refusal to adhere to any structured processes creates chaos and confusion. Important decisions are made on a whim, disregarding the concerns and opinions of employees who possess valuable insights. One of the most concerning aspects of the toxic leadership is their tendency to undermine employees' concerns. Instead of fostering an environment that encourages open dialogue and feedback, senior management dismisses any dissenting opinions as irrelevant. This not only stifles innovation but also creates a sense of fear among employees, inhibiting their willingness to speak up and contribute constructively. Furthermore, the company's lack of psychological safety is disheartening. Employees constantly feel on edge, fearing retribution if they express differing views or challenge the status quo. The absence of a supportive and inclusive culture hampers collaboration and hinders the organization's ability to adapt and improve. Regrettably, the toxic leadership has led to a high turnover rate at Re-engage. Talented individuals who could have made significant contributions to the charity are driven away by the hostile work environment. The constant turnover not only disrupts team dynamics but also hampers the continuity and effectiveness of initiatives aimed at helping the elderly. Re-engage is a charity with a noble mission, but its toxic leadership prevents the organisation from reaching its full potential. The exceptional frontline staff is the backbone of the organisation, tirelessly working to make a positive impact on the lives of the elderly. However, without addressing the toxic leadership and fostering a culture of respect, open communication, and psychological safety, Re-engage will struggle to attract and retain talented individuals who can help the charity thrive.

10
4,0
10 mar 2026
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

An excellent ceo who is approachable and cares about the staff and the mission. Flexible working and trust staff A talented team of staff who truly care and work hard for the mission

Svantaggi

Same as any organisation, there is pressure to hit targets, and the priorities change regularly whilst trying to find the solution to help people the best way possible

Vedi recensioni per: Utile|Valutazione|Data|Tutto