Erratic, baseless behavior from leadership. Jobseekers apply at your own risk. - Recensione dipendente - Technical Recruiter presso Recruiting from Scratch

2,0
10 nov 2022
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

The employees themselves working at RFS are spirited, dynamic, and willing to help. 100% Remote

Svantaggi

Leadership takes a very deficit-minded approach. During this last recession, when companies were pausing hiring and the use of agencies and making lay-off. Leadership at RFS taught that the best strategy to offset this was to put it's employees on PIP plans if they went a month without making a hire. The conditions on this PIP were to get a hire within 30 days of being put on the PIP or be terminated. Targets set by leadership are baseless. Leadership claims to use data in their decision-making, but when you compare their actions to what the data says, you will quickly understand they have no idea what they are actually doing. Their strategy is based on how they feel that day. There are multiple employees who have been terminated right when their candidates at the last stage of their interview. Leadership does this, so they do not have to pay out the recruiter if the candidate gets and accepts an offer. RFS is a revolving door, apply at your own risk. More likely than not you will be used, chewed, and spit out. Most people who start here are fired within 3 months of starting, so leadership does not have to worry about developing or supporting their employees.

avatar
Risposta di Recruiting from Scratch
3y
Thank you for taking the time to share your thoughts and concerns about your experience. Regarding Performance Improvement Plans, we understand that it can be a challenging experience for employees. The intention behind implementing a PIP is to provide support and guidance to individuals who may be struggling to meet their performance goals. Our intention has always been to navigate the challenging economic circumstances while ensuring the long-term sustainability of our business and the well-being of our employees. Once again, we appreciate your feedback.

Esplora altre recensioni su Recruiting from Scratch

5,0
11 ott 2025
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

Good client list Commission structure

Svantaggi

Competition between recruiters within the agency

1,0
24 dic 2025
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

- Opportunity to work with early-stage, VC-backed startups (through a third-party VMS, not directly due to severe lack of business development) - Fully remote - Teammates were generally supportive and hardworking, despite leadership challenges

Svantaggi

In my experience, this firm is led by an owner who creates an unstable, hostile, and unethical work environment. Compensation practices are far below industry standards for technical recruiting. Commission payouts of 5% (up to $150k threshold per quarter, then 10% after meeting that) are significantly under marker, especially given the demand of startup technical recruiting. Compensation terms were frequently unclear, inconsistently applied, and subject to change at "leadership's" discretion. Leadership routinely promises bonuses or additional compensation in writing, only to later redirect those funds toward hiring new staff instead. Employees were aggressively encouraged to push harder based on these promises, which were not honored. Bringing up previously documented bonus commitments was met with hostility, threats of termination, or retaliation. There is a consistent pattern of intimidation and harassment. Employees receive excessive and aggressive messages, often creating a culture of fear. Asking reasonable questions about compensation or expectations can result in threats, public shaming, or disciplinary action. Retaliation is very real. In one instance, an employee was placed on a PIP simply for asking about a promised bonus. In my own case, I attempted to resign professionally by providing written notice. I was terminated immediately upon doing so. During that conversation, leadership made statements implying that others would also be terminated if they did not explicitly agree with him. This behavior further reinforced an atmosphere where employees felt unsafe expressing or acting professionally. Favoritism is pervasive. Commission payments appear to be withheld or altered based on personal preference or leadership's personal pocketbooks rather than performance. Leadership lacks professional management experience and demonstrates very little understanding of ethical employer responsibilities, despite running a recruitment agency. Additionally, there were deeply concerning patters in how people of color or women were treated compared to others on the team. Concerns about their inequitable treatment were dismissed rather than addressed. Many, if not all, employees took this role out of necessity during an extremely difficult job market. In my experience, leadership exploited that vulnerability through challenging personal and economic circumstances, which he actually full-blown admitted and even bragged about on multiple occasions. Job seekers: Proceed with extreme caution. Get EVERYTHING in writing. Expect below-market compensation, unpredictable management behavior, and a lack of psychological safety. Keep interviewing even after you sign this offer.

1
Vedi recensioni per: Utile|Valutazione|Data|Tutto