Great product potential overshadowed by toxic culture and fraud - Recensione dipendente - Anonymous Employee presso Safe Security

1,0
15 apr 2026
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

The product has great potential

Svantaggi

Where do I start! First this company is a complete fraud. They claim to be an American company to prospects but in reality the founders are all citizens of India. All functions like HR, Finance, Legal, Engineering, CISO,Product all sit in India. The culture here is the worst I have ever seen. Public firings, condescending CEO that degrades you in front of the entire company. There is zero diversity, zero boundaries. The company has missed there number 3 quarters in a row. Lack of adult leadership. Constant GTM pivots never allowing the sales teams to get any traction. The CEO hides behind transparency and acting like he cares about people but this could not be further from the truth. Stay away from this place unless you are desperate for a job even then make it a short stop.

Esplora altre recensioni su Safe Security

5,0
21 apr 2026
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

Genuinely category-defining work in cyber risk - from CRQ, TPRM to CTEM — not marketing fluff, real outcomes for CISOs. Fast-paced, intellectually stimulating environment where good ideas win regardless of who they come from. Leadership is accessible, decisive, and transparent about where the company is headed and why.

Svantaggi

Moving fast means priorities can shift; comfort with ambiguity is a real requirement, not a cliché. The bar is high and the pace is relentless; not the right fit for someone looking to coast.

6
1,0
3 mag 2026
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

Some individual engineers/other employees were genuinely helpful and kind.

Svantaggi

The company somehow has both heavy processes and constant urgency, which produces chaos instead of structure. Leadership frequently calls the organization a “family” and claims to be transparent, but communication is selective and decisions happen behind closed doors. Engineering culture is defined by constant overwork and subtle pressure to offload tasks onto others just to stay afloat. You spend as much time defending your workload and deadlines as you do actually building anything. The CEO’s mindset feels stuck in 2015—there are frequent “Ferrari” metaphors, “work harder” rhetoric, and at one point, even a story shared in a surprisingly celebratory tone about a former employee who worked himself into a heart attack. This fits a broader pattern: a strong emphasis on minimizing short-term costs rather than making decisions with long-term stability or scalability in mind, which raises questions about the company’s longer-term direction. A significant number of US engineers had already been quitting because the workload and expectations were identical across regions while the compensation didn’t come close to matching US cost of living; unlike in India, labor protections and broader opportunities made leaving a more realistic option. The US engineering layoffs were ultimately explained as a reaction to several managers quitting, yet they came directly on the heels of this wave of voluntary departures. This also matters when reading reviews, since employee experiences and incentives can differ significantly by region.

6
Vedi recensioni per: Utile|Valutazione|Data|Tutto