Toxic processes, constant pressure, and extremely high turnover (former Criterion HCM) - Recensione dipendente - Senior Scala Developer presso Sage

1,0
3 dic 2025
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

• A few genuinely talented engineers who try to support each other. • A good example of how engineering culture should not be organized. • Some interesting technical challenges buried under dysfunctional processes.

Svantaggi

• I worked here as a Scala developer, and the entire workflow is extremely poorly structured. • The company (formerly Criterion HCM) still relies on outdated, rigid, and toxic management practices. • Mandatory weekly calls with performance evaluations — KPIs are prioritized over meaningful engineering work. • You are required to close a certain number of tasks, regardless of their value or relevance. • Constant internal competition for tasks because your job security depends on hitting numeric targets, not delivering quality. • Very high turnover — Scala developers typically leave within 8–9 months due to burnout or layoffs. • Huge amounts of undocumented legacy code, making development slow and frustrating. • Management shows little respect for employees and treats them as replaceable. • No real technical leadership; decisions are pushed top-down without understanding the actual problems. • Invasive monitoring tools are used: the company relies on screenshot-tracking and time-tracking software like Hubstaff, which captures your screen and monitors activity throughout the day. This adds even more pressure and reduces trust to zero. • Overall, the environment is stressful, demotivating, and unsustainable.

avatar
Risposta di Sage
5mo
Thank you for sharing your experience. We’re sorry to hear that aspects of your time at Sage felt stressful and challenging. Your feedback around processes, KPIs, and trust is important, and we’ll ensure it’s reviewed by the relevant teams. At Sage, we aim to foster a culture of clarity and collaboration, and insights like yours help us identify areas for improvement.

Esplora altre recensioni su Sage

5,0
5 giu 2026
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

They will work with you and teach you everything you need to know and help you as long as you help yourself and meet kpi but they help you meet it

Svantaggi

No cons to add at this time

2,0
8 giu 2026
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

was hired as remote and get to have that honored, but have been openly told no career progression because of remote status. decent pay

Svantaggi

Leadership instability: Seven manager changes during my relatively short tenure. Unrealistic targets: A sales quota set at 1,100% growth (not a typo). Slow product development: Getting anything actioned on the product side takes far too long. Product management turnover: Three product manager changes, resulting in no meaningful deliverables in over three years. Misaligned hiring priorities: Greater emphasis on DEI optics than on hiring people positioned to drive growth. Internal vs. customer focus: More energy spent on internal events than on product enhancements. Lack of accountability (the biggest issue): No one takes ownership. Responsibility gets passed around constantly — for example, client cancellations going unprocessed because they impact someone's numbers. Managers have openly encouraged pushing the work onto someone else rather than handling it.

Vedi recensioni per: Utile|Valutazione|Data|Tutto