employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Sagent Behavioral Health

Questa è la tua azienda?

All for profit. - Recensione dipendente - Counselor presso Sagent Behavioral Health

1,0
14 ott 2021
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

I had some amazing coworkers, which isn’t a pro if the company - just working in mental health there tends to be many amazing people.

Svantaggi

Poor training, lack of support of all staff, they care about money more than clients, staff or employee happiness, overworked and underpaid, terrible benefits, they don’t listen to needs of employees, if an employee voiced concerns or needs they’re made to feel incompetent or replaceable, unethical practices, not given time for documentation - expected to work overtime for that, upper managements/owners/HR are all for profit as well so there’s no way to get support. All the good people are leaving, or being let go/demoted for standing up for their employees/coworkers/clients. They talk a good talk when they hire people, then they’re blindsided by the truth. I’d never recommend this company as an employer.

Esplora altre recensioni su Sagent Behavioral Health

5,0
14 apr 2026
Dipendente anonimo
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

Leaders share a common goal of increasing access to mental health services. Particularly appreciate the legal work that the team does. Flexible work environment

Svantaggi

Health insurance and pay models can be confusing at first

2,0
7 mag 2026
Dipendente anonimo
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

Its a good place for newer clinicians to gain experience and receive company-paid supervision. One of the strongest aspects of the organization is the flexibility it offers, including a high degree of control over scheduling.

Svantaggi

Nystrom and Ellie merged several months ago, and since then there has been a notable loss of med providers, therapists, directors, managers, recruiters, HR staff, and employees across multiple departments. Although described as a merger, the transition has functioned more like an acquisition, with little of Ellie’s original culture remaining. The EMR transition was poorly executed and created significant disruption for staff. Required training took place during evenings or weekends, cutting into employees’ personal time and work/life balance. Offering snacks or pizza did not make up for the expectation that staff complete training outside normal working hours. Since the merger, productivity and billing expectations have continued to rise while compensation has become less favorable. Pay increases are based only on years within the organization, rather than prior clinical experience or expertise. PTO offerings are limited, and retirement benefits provide only a minimal employer contribution tied to employee participation. There is also currently a shortage of available clients in some areas, and because compensation is heavily tied to the number of clients seen, many providers experience inconsistent and unpredictable income. Employees who raise concerns or offer constructive feedback often feel dismissed or marginalized, while advancement appears more closely tied to alignment with leadership than openness to organizational improvement.

Vedi recensioni per: Utile|Valutazione|Data|Tutto