Pros and Cons...just like anywhere - Recensione dipendente - Front End Applications Development presso Selective Insurance

3,0
19 gen 2017
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

Good people...I mean it. The people there, by and large, were very nice. Most everyone seemed willing to help and provide knowledge where possible. Good benefits and salary.

Svantaggi

Meetings, meetings and more meetings. Projects consisted of about 10 managers / spec makers, and one developer. That developer spent more time in meetings about how the project was coming along than actually developing. Another major con is the amount of outsourcing. It seems like all the knowledge in the company is being transferred from implementation to babysitting offshore resources. Because of this and other, more politically motivated reasons, long time employees are leaving, and their knowledge leaves with it.

Esplora altre recensioni su Selective Insurance

5,0
17 apr 2026
Dipendente anonimo
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

Strong but difficult leadership during transformation.

Svantaggi

Relocation causing some some concern

2
1,0
26 mag 2026
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

Decent benefits and decent coworkers

Svantaggi

Working at Selective was a toxic work environment shaped by favoritism, excessive workload expectations, and poor boundaries around employee availability. Management often applied expectations unevenly, which created a lack of fairness and accountability. High performance did not always seem to be the primary factor in decision-making, which undermined trust in leadership. There was also a strong “big fish, small pond” dynamic, where internal status and informal influence often carried more weight than actual performance or collaboration. This contributed to a highly political environment where trust between colleagues was limited and information did not always feel safe to share openly. Employees were expected to be available far beyond normal working hours, creating an unsustainable “always on” culture with no real work-life balance. The workload was consistently too high for the compensation provided. Internal politics further interfered with day-to-day work and made collaboration more difficult than it needed to be. In practice, this environment often encouraged self-preservation over teamwork, which made it difficult to build trust or rely on others consistently. Overall, the environment was not structured in a way that supported long-term employee wellbeing or retention. This is not a workplace that supports a healthy work-life balance. For me, the experience felt unsustainable, and over time it became clear that the environment was not conducive to long-term growth or wellbeing.

2
Vedi recensioni per: Utile|Valutazione|Data|Tutto