Has-been's, wannabe's, and never will's - Recensione dipendente - Software Engineer presso SiteRx

2,0
22 feb 2022
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

Fair pay, remote work. Not much else I can think of.

Svantaggi

The title of this review is how I'd describe the executive level folks at Site Rx. A motley group of talking heads who don't have a real idea how to execute and are trying to fight to keep their own positions. Meanwhile the core business idea is questionable at best, on the surface it helps needy patients connect with research trials. The more people connected, the more money flows in so you can see how this can easily get out of hand. And the scale up idea?: Just pick any new disease and herd in those patients too .Yikes. There are some concepts that lend well to frictionless automation. Online shopping is probably better for it, but medical research trials are not. Site Rx will end badly.

Esplora altre recensioni su SiteRx

5,0
18 mag 2026
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

An invigorating culture with dedicated and inspiring coworkers who are easy to work with

Svantaggi

Hours can get hefty at times

1,0
21 gen 2026
Dipendente anonimo
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

The mission for the company is good.

Svantaggi

Coming from the legal department, I observed multiple practices that were deeply concerning from both a healthcare ethics and compliance standpoint. There were repeated situations that raised serious questions about legality, accountability, and governance. The executive leadership team is fundamentally misaligned with the rest of the organization. Decision-making at the top often felt disconnected, inconsistent, and uninformed by the realities of day-to-day operations. Policies, particularly around PTO and benefits for lower-level employees, were changed multiple times with little transparency, creating instability and eroding trust. Leadership frequently said one thing and did another. Opportunities for growth were extremely limited. Rather than developing talent, leadership allowed certain directors, particularly within the patient and call center teams, to operate without oversight. These individuals created toxic environments, spoke about employees in an unprofessional, almost high-school manner, and ultimately drove out more than 15 staff members. Several leadership roles appeared to be filled based on personal relationships rather than qualifications or performance. For example, overseeing a department of 40+ employees and representing a core function of the company requires proven leadership and operational expertise, not unrelated prior experience. This lack of qualification directly impacted morale, retention, and departmental effectiveness. Additionally, poor management within call center operations led to significant inefficiencies, slowing patient funneling and costing the company substantial revenue. These issues persisted despite being visible and correctable. Overall, the company prioritizes personal connections over merit, consistency, and accountability.

4
Vedi recensioni per: Utile|Valutazione|Data|Tutto