CPMC - good place to work - Recensione dipendente - Dipendente anonimo presso Sutter Health

4,0
9 nov 2009
Dipendente anonimo
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

I can speak for the division I worked. It was great because of opportunities to learn, co-worker encouragement, co-worker attitudes towards a life-work balance, opportunities for advancement. The organization as a whole offers fantastic benefits and a good compensation package. There were always workshops to attend to add to one's knowledge. Patient safety is highly valued, from what I saw.

Svantaggi

The actual manager of my division was on a strange power trip, and made a lot of decisions that seemed unwise and were totally out of touch with what her subordinates thought. However she didn't work there very long since I think she was eventually let go after I left. CPMC has an integral wellness center, but there are still many unhealthy things about the hospital - the cafeteria food was plain bad and artery clogging, cafeteria cleanliness seemed to be low priority, and the hospital doesn't even do basic recycling or other environmental practices. (Perhaps this has something to do with the unions there?) In the research division, all the studies were pharmaceutical company sponsored, but I wish there were more studies focused less on pharmaceuticals and more on overall treatment and overall patient wellness.

Esplora altre recensioni su Sutter Health

5,0
11 giu 2026
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

The top-notch professionalism work-culture is what made me decide to switch from a contract-worker to a full-time RN.

Svantaggi

I wish that the N95 mask requirement was included while I was in Chicago in my remote physical and urine drug testing during pre-employment. I had to fly in SF for one day to meet the N95 fit requirement then fly back to Chicago to spend more time with family.

3,0
11 giu 2026
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

Leadership trainings, conferences, educational opportunities, Senior leadership seems to respond to employee feedback, Great organizational transparency and clarity around goals and direction, Front-line leadership receiving recognition more often, Fair (not amazing) compensation and benefits overall, Organization seems to be healthy and growing which is encouraging for job security and retention.

Svantaggi

Unsustainable front-line leadership expectations, responsibilities, and tasks without providing support from supervisors or assistant managers specifically in San Francisco campuses, High burnout risk among front-line leaders which is continuing to increase, Growing list of contradicting or conflicting priorities. Patient experience scores have improved greatly in SF but patient quality/safety and employee satisfaction has become the apparent cost of that, Very unreasonable span of control for front-line leaders, i.e. way too many direct reports, Meeting metrics and KPIs at all costs is the message being received. Front-line leaders are left scrambling to reach the data points (regardless of the methods), to get there. In other words, we might be meeting the metrics and KPIs on paper, but that doesn’t necessarily mean the real purpose or reason behind those metrics is being performed. We’re just desperate to keep our jobs, The leadership culture in the last 6-9 months has shifted towards motivation through fear. Fear of losing our jobs or bonuses rather than motivation by providing actual daily support in doing our jobs and genuine concern and encouragement to succeed.

Vedi recensioni per: Utile|Valutazione|Data|Tutto