Started strong, but ended in an unsustainable environment - Recensione dipendente - Dipendente anonimo presso Tattle

2,0
22 lug 2025
Dipendente anonimo
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

Fully remote Freedom to problem solve

Svantaggi

My early experience at Tattle was genuinely rewarding. The environment initially fostered creativity, problem-solving, and agility, especially compared to the overly rigid workplaces I had come from. It felt like a place where ideas were valued and teams could collaborate to build something meaningful. Unfortunately, the culture shifted dramatically over time. What once felt balanced and mission-driven became increasingly toxic and politically charged. One team in particular, responsible for much of the post-sale customer work, was consistently deprioritized, both in terms of staffing and recognition. While other departments were celebrated for metrics that relied heavily on behind-the-scenes execution, the actual contributors were left overextended and under-resourced. This led to an unsustainable workload and significant burnout. At one point, only two people were left to manage the majority of customer accounts after several others left with no plans for backfilling. Interdepartmental collaboration also suffered. Input during meetings was often disregarded, even in front of clients, which created confusion and mistrust externally and frustration internally. One incident that stood out involved inappropriate comments made in a public company communication channel, targeting employees in a way that was deeply unprofessional. When concerns about the incident were raised through the proper internal channels, the response was not constructive. Instead, it escalated into a hostile interaction. After a follow-up call, it was later claimed that something I had said during that conversation warranted termination. Anticipating the potential for a negative outcome due to the existing atmosphere, I had documented the conversation. That documentation ultimately protected me, as it clearly showed that I had acted appropriately. Without it, the outcome could have been very different. This situation made it clear that raising concerns came with real risk, and that retaliation, not resolution, was often the default response. It was a turning point in how I viewed the company’s culture and leadership approach. The most disappointing part is that many of these challenges were avoidable. A company that once showed so much potential has allowed internal politics and short-term thinking to overtake its original values. The team responsible for much of the customer-facing work continues to be overburdened, even as demand grows. The result is a workplace that no longer prioritizes respect, sustainability, or employee well-being. However, toward the end of my tenure, and especially after moving on to a healthier workplace, I was able to reflect more clearly on how drastically things had changed. What once felt like a promising, collaborative company unfortunately evolved into a toxic and imbalanced environment, particularly for the Customer Success (CS) team.

Esplora altre recensioni su Tattle

5,0
13 lug 2022
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

- Pay and benefits are excellent - Working environment is very positive. Learning and taking the time to "do it right" are encouraged - Management are highly capable, good communicators, and lead by example - Lots of growth, both for the business and personally

Svantaggi

Fully remote can make it hard to feel connected with the company at large. Currently no planned company-wide events to get everyone together.

2,0
18 feb 2026
Dipendente anonimo
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

- Good place to learn for the self-directed who don't mind a LOT of ambiguity - ICs are a talented, kind, diverse group that know and care for each other

Svantaggi

- The executive team is disconnected from development reality. The executive effort is focused elsewhere, leaving the technical leadership to set pace and culture alone. That leadership values loyalty over performance. There are favorites who receive support and others who are micromanaged or managed out, regardless of contribution. Technical leadership is often too focused on working in the trenches to lead fairly and effectively. - There was a push to create a middle management layer that felt disconnected from the real work. The roles were filled without regard for technical proficiency or soft skills necessary for small team management, resulting in managers who will not advocate for their teams or push back on unrealistic demands. - The product team struggles to define clear, realistic requirements and roadmaps. There is a clear lack of understanding of how software is built, leading to churn, rework, and minimal pushback when the customer changes their mind late in the cycle. Engineering is mostly blamed for the delays this causes. - The culture is often high pressure and transactional, with team members being let go after a crunch or deliverable completion. - Offboarding is cold, abrupt, and lacks transparency. No one is sure where the hammer will fall next, only to figure it out when someone fails to make their next meeting.

Vedi recensioni per: Utile|Valutazione|Data|Tutto