Good Engineers, Bad C leaders - Recensione dipendente - Senior Cloud Connect Engineer presso Veeam Software

2,0
17 lug 2023
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

Pay was reasonable Lower and Mid management were reasonable and respectful Working with fellow engineers was enjoyable

Svantaggi

1. CEO and above that made bad decisions like cutting people that have worked at the company for years. I wasn't one of them, but I saw 200 people get cut right before I left. They made policies for folks that stayed that were too difficult and were never obtainable in the entire history of my employment, which were all verified by factual statistics. 2. Not enough opportunities for folks that actually want to succeed in an IT career 3. Bad work life balance

Esplora altre recensioni su Veeam Software

5,0
17 mag 2026
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

solid coworkers good product market fit

Svantaggi

already a very large company?

avatar
Risposta di Veeam Software
6d
Thank you for sharing your experience! We're happy to hear you've connected with great colleagues -building strong teams is something we take seriously. Veeam has grown significantly in the last years, which can take some getting used to, but we work hard to maintain the collaborative spirit. Welcome aboard, and we hope the first year is just the beginning of a great journey here.
2,0
3 feb 2026
Dipendente anonimo
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

Pay is good as well as benefits.

Svantaggi

Poor organizational structure and lack of clarity: Roles, responsibilities, and reporting lines were confusing. This made collaboration and accountability very difficult. Nepotism and favoritism in leadership: Upper management heavily favored hiring and promoting people from their previous companies the "buddy system". Loyalty to personal networks appeared to matter more than competence or performance, which created cliques and made nonconnected employees feel like outsiders. Hypocritical company culture: Leadership frequently talked about "employee matters" values, strong culture, and employee well being, but in practice these were not reflected in actions. Layoffs, heavy workloads after staff reductions, and a focus on looking good on paper undermined any real trust. Frequent layoffs and job insecurity: Multiple rounds of layoffs created constant uncertainty. Remaining employees were expected to absorb significantly more work with fewer resources and little recognition or support. Heavy favoritism toward offshoring and lower cost international employees: Upper management strongly preferred hiring or retaining talent in countries with significantly lower cost of living because their lower salaries made departmental budgets and headcount metrics look better on paper. This resulted in U.S. based employees being disproportionately targeted in layoffs or overlooked for retention/promotion.

6
Vedi recensioni per: Utile|Valutazione|Data|Tutto