Depends on who your work for and with - Recensione dipendente - Dipendente anonimo presso Verisk

3,0
25 ott 2025
Dipendente anonimo
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

Great benefits including low HC premiums, solid employer match for 401K, decent vacation, etc.

Svantaggi

Many mid and senior level managers are not held to appropriate HR standards and it impacts morale.

avatar
Risposta di Verisk
7mo
We are glad you were happy with your compensation package, and specifically the employer match for 401k and paid time off. We consistently review our compensation levels for market competitiveness and alignment with our pay-for-performance philosophy. Thank you for providing your perspective on leadership and management. Our leadership team is open to feedback and suggestions; this is part of our commitment to learning, caring, and results and a foundation of the way we work. We take your feedback seriously and are committed to addressing concerns about leadership effectiveness. If you have instances you’d like to discuss, please contact your HRBP.

Esplora altre recensioni su Verisk

5,0
30 giu 2026
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

The commitment to flexibility and hybrid work is amazing! The US has a very robust benefits offering. There are several learning and development programs with a diverse range of offerings from self-paced training to more interactive live courses. The people are incredible, you will not find nicer company.

Svantaggi

Verisk is an environment for "do-ers". This is a great place to build your career if you have great work ethic and are motivated to ty new things.

2,0
30 giu 2026
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

The people. I worked with genuinely talented, hardworking colleagues who showed up for each other and for the work, even when leadership made that hard.

Svantaggi

Leadership at the senior level was chaotic and unclear, and it trickled down into everything. Projects routinely landed with little to no notice, leaving teams scrambling instead of planning. Budgets were micromanaged from the top while strategic direction was not — a strange mix of tight control over spending and almost no clarity on priorities. Communication from senior leadership rarely made it down to the people actually doing the work, so teams were often the last to know about decisions that directly affected them. There was also a clear undercurrent of fear among some senior leaders that discouraged any real innovation or experimentation — better to play it safe than propose something new. If you're someone who thrives on clarity, planning, and a culture that rewards new ideas, this is not that environment.

Vedi recensioni per: Utile|Valutazione|Data|Tutto