Solid company - Recensione dipendente - Product Manager presso Verisk

4,0
30 ago 2019
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

Company is a solid company with strong foundations and positive outlook. Excellent products which grow year over year and have dominate market position. People for the most part are great and the company is making attempts to modernize HR offerings surrounding free perks such as snacks, social spaces, etc. The work life balance is extremely positive. For the most part leadership is flexible and understanding.

Svantaggi

Salary is not competitive and the company struggles to manage/balance internal vs. external candidate management in this regards. If you are an internal employee you will most likely be underpaid in relation to the market and your incoming external co-workers...and underpaid significantly. Bonus and Raises, while present are not fairly distributed to those high performers and this creates a culture where top performers are working their butts off and often supporting under performers who never face any sort of negative impact from their lack of productivity.

Esplora altre recensioni su Verisk

5,0
30 giu 2026
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

The commitment to flexibility and hybrid work is amazing! The US has a very robust benefits offering. There are several learning and development programs with a diverse range of offerings from self-paced training to more interactive live courses. The people are incredible, you will not find nicer company.

Svantaggi

Verisk is an environment for "do-ers". This is a great place to build your career if you have great work ethic and are motivated to ty new things.

2,0
30 giu 2026
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

The people. I worked with genuinely talented, hardworking colleagues who showed up for each other and for the work, even when leadership made that hard.

Svantaggi

Leadership at the senior level was chaotic and unclear, and it trickled down into everything. Projects routinely landed with little to no notice, leaving teams scrambling instead of planning. Budgets were micromanaged from the top while strategic direction was not — a strange mix of tight control over spending and almost no clarity on priorities. Communication from senior leadership rarely made it down to the people actually doing the work, so teams were often the last to know about decisions that directly affected them. There was also a clear undercurrent of fear among some senior leaders that discouraged any real innovation or experimentation — better to play it safe than propose something new. If you're someone who thrives on clarity, planning, and a culture that rewards new ideas, this is not that environment.

Vedi recensioni per: Utile|Valutazione|Data|Tutto