Bad management good people - Recensione dipendente - Technical Lead presso Verisk

3,0
16 mar 2023
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

Friendly staff and developer community. Uses latest tech. Stack hence room to update your skill sets. Decent health care options.

Svantaggi

To grow in this org, you will have to constantly agree to your manager and just be his puppet. There are few good manager but you need to be lucky to work under them. This org like people working late night and whole night but they won’t value smart talent. They will hire new talent and pay double the salary then paid to existing similar level staff. There is no concept of salary revision as per the market, they will simply stick to their 2% max increment.

avatar
Risposta di Verisk
3y
Thank you for sharing your feedback. One of Verisk’s values is our commitment to results. We encourage innovation and open communication between all levels. The annual Employee Engagement Survey is also a great opportunity to provide feedback on leadership and management.

Esplora altre recensioni su Verisk

5,0
30 giu 2026
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

The commitment to flexibility and hybrid work is amazing! The US has a very robust benefits offering. There are several learning and development programs with a diverse range of offerings from self-paced training to more interactive live courses. The people are incredible, you will not find nicer company.

Svantaggi

Verisk is an environment for "do-ers". This is a great place to build your career if you have great work ethic and are motivated to ty new things.

2,0
30 giu 2026
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

The people. I worked with genuinely talented, hardworking colleagues who showed up for each other and for the work, even when leadership made that hard.

Svantaggi

Leadership at the senior level was chaotic and unclear, and it trickled down into everything. Projects routinely landed with little to no notice, leaving teams scrambling instead of planning. Budgets were micromanaged from the top while strategic direction was not — a strange mix of tight control over spending and almost no clarity on priorities. Communication from senior leadership rarely made it down to the people actually doing the work, so teams were often the last to know about decisions that directly affected them. There was also a clear undercurrent of fear among some senior leaders that discouraged any real innovation or experimentation — better to play it safe than propose something new. If you're someone who thrives on clarity, planning, and a culture that rewards new ideas, this is not that environment.

Vedi recensioni per: Utile|Valutazione|Data|Tutto