Good Work Life Balance and Pay - Recensione dipendente - Software Quality Assurance Engineer presso Verisk

4,0
25 apr 2024
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

Touchstone is a catastrophe modelling product is very vast. Work life balance is very good, pay/salaries are also good Has very strong experienced team to guide/mentor the beginners or intermediate level

Svantaggi

Everything is good at this company, don't see any cons

avatar
Risposta di Verisk
2y
Greetings! We were so thrilled to read your review. We appreciate your feedback and are delighted to hear about your positive experience working with us. We are happy to hear that you are pleased with the leadership team and how well they mentor entry and intermediate level employees. We believe our greatest resource is our people. To best support the evolving needs of our teams, our leaders rely on employee feedback to inform and shape Verisk’s total rewards, benefits, programs, and resources.

Esplora altre recensioni su Verisk

5,0
30 giu 2026
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

The commitment to flexibility and hybrid work is amazing! The US has a very robust benefits offering. There are several learning and development programs with a diverse range of offerings from self-paced training to more interactive live courses. The people are incredible, you will not find nicer company.

Svantaggi

Verisk is an environment for "do-ers". This is a great place to build your career if you have great work ethic and are motivated to ty new things.

2,0
30 giu 2026
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

The people. I worked with genuinely talented, hardworking colleagues who showed up for each other and for the work, even when leadership made that hard.

Svantaggi

Leadership at the senior level was chaotic and unclear, and it trickled down into everything. Projects routinely landed with little to no notice, leaving teams scrambling instead of planning. Budgets were micromanaged from the top while strategic direction was not — a strange mix of tight control over spending and almost no clarity on priorities. Communication from senior leadership rarely made it down to the people actually doing the work, so teams were often the last to know about decisions that directly affected them. There was also a clear undercurrent of fear among some senior leaders that discouraged any real innovation or experimentation — better to play it safe than propose something new. If you're someone who thrives on clarity, planning, and a culture that rewards new ideas, this is not that environment.

1
Vedi recensioni per: Utile|Valutazione|Data|Tutto