Could be the dream - if there was opportunity to grow - Recensione dipendente - Program Analyst II presso World Resources Institute

3,0
7 feb 2022
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

Terrific colleagues who are intelligent and passionate as well as kind to one another. The Institute listens to its employees and is making efforts to diversify. The institute is increasingly empowering experts in the global offices (as opposed to USA) to lead on a global level.

Svantaggi

Very crowded at the top with egoistic experts who consume opportunities that would otherwise encourage junior colleagues to grow. Feels like you can't complain about the attitudes and behaviors of higher ups because they're famous/thought leaders/WRI's bread and butter. The pay is truly terrible and it takes a long time to move up the ladder. You need impressive degrees to work here, but you'll never be able to pay them off if you do.

Esplora altre recensioni su World Resources Institute

5,0
5 mag 2026
Dipendente anonimo
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

Great place to work - wonderful colleagues

Svantaggi

Structure does not always meet individual needs

4,0
7 mag 2026
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

Mission-driven work - Smart , friendly and passionate colleagues - Global impact - Collaborative culture - Strong reputation — Flexible / progressive work environment - Innovation-oriented Diverse international perspective A leadership that cares: the global leadership stepped in when U.S. funding was unexpectedly canceled, providing financial support for several programs for a few months to give teams time to secure new funding sources.

Svantaggi

Resource constraints affecting efficiency: working with limited staffing and budgets sometimes made it challenging to execute projects efficiently Compensation compared to the private sector: salaries are noticeably lower than for private-sector roles, which is especially challenging in a city like NYC. Project direction influenced by funding priorities: I noticed that donor and grant priorities often shaped the direction of projects. Career progression tied to funding cycles: advancement opportunities often depended on program funding rather than purely on performance.

Vedi recensioni per: Utile|Valutazione|Data|Tutto