Great Org, Low Pay - Recensione dipendente - Specialist presso World Resources Institute

4,0
7 dic 2022
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

I love my team at WRI. My managers aren't perfect, but they are supportive, understanding, thoughtful, and smart. I hugely appreciate this sense of community, and it is a large reason why I can see myself at WRI in the long term. I don't think this is true across the entire institution, but I'm grateful it's true for my project.

Svantaggi

Unfortunately, the pay just isn't high enough. If I am promoted at least every two years going forward with a significant salary bump, I will stay. If not, I'll go somewhere where I make 30% more for the same job (and not even in the private sector.) I genuinely would like to continue to work at WRI, I just hope they can become more competitive in salary and benefits.

Esplora altre recensioni su World Resources Institute

5,0
5 mag 2026
Dipendente anonimo
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

Great place to work - wonderful colleagues

Svantaggi

Structure does not always meet individual needs

4,0
7 mag 2026
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

Mission-driven work - Smart , friendly and passionate colleagues - Global impact - Collaborative culture - Strong reputation — Flexible / progressive work environment - Innovation-oriented Diverse international perspective A leadership that cares: the global leadership stepped in when U.S. funding was unexpectedly canceled, providing financial support for several programs for a few months to give teams time to secure new funding sources.

Svantaggi

Resource constraints affecting efficiency: working with limited staffing and budgets sometimes made it challenging to execute projects efficiently Compensation compared to the private sector: salaries are noticeably lower than for private-sector roles, which is especially challenging in a city like NYC. Project direction influenced by funding priorities: I noticed that donor and grant priorities often shaped the direction of projects. Career progression tied to funding cycles: advancement opportunities often depended on program funding rather than purely on performance.

Vedi recensioni per: Utile|Valutazione|Data|Tutto