Doing too much - Recensione dipendente - Research Analyst I presso World Resources Institute

4,0
23 dic 2022
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

I’ve worked on a few teams at WRI and have learned that most people’s experience at WRI is dictated by their manager and team. I’ve been lucky that everyone I’ve worked with at WRI has been extremely smart, dedicated, and gone out of their way to help junior staff. Though this isn’t everyone’s experience, senior staff I work with have made sure to elevate my work and the work of other junior staff to leadership while also providing opportunities for growth. It’s a great organization if you’re on a good team but that’s a big “if”.

Svantaggi

Too many small projects spread across a very confusing internal structure which makes it difficult for teams to function well and finish work on schedule.

Esplora altre recensioni su World Resources Institute

5,0
5 mag 2026
Dipendente anonimo
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

Great place to work - wonderful colleagues

Svantaggi

Structure does not always meet individual needs

4,0
7 mag 2026
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

Mission-driven work - Smart , friendly and passionate colleagues - Global impact - Collaborative culture - Strong reputation — Flexible / progressive work environment - Innovation-oriented Diverse international perspective A leadership that cares: the global leadership stepped in when U.S. funding was unexpectedly canceled, providing financial support for several programs for a few months to give teams time to secure new funding sources.

Svantaggi

Resource constraints affecting efficiency: working with limited staffing and budgets sometimes made it challenging to execute projects efficiently Compensation compared to the private sector: salaries are noticeably lower than for private-sector roles, which is especially challenging in a city like NYC. Project direction influenced by funding priorities: I noticed that donor and grant priorities often shaped the direction of projects. Career progression tied to funding cycles: advancement opportunities often depended on program funding rather than purely on performance.

Vedi recensioni per: Utile|Valutazione|Data|Tutto