Has potential, but most is wasted on poor senior management and administrative team - Recensione dipendente - Project Coordinator presso World Resources Institute

2,0
29 apr 2024
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

Interesting work. Well-regarded institution. Projects depend on successful proposals, so there can be flexibility in the topics and type of work a team does. Young staff (coordinators and some managers) are well-prepared and friendly, there's a good atmosphere.

Svantaggi

Your experience depends a lot on your manager. Many senior staff members have lost interest in work and projects and they become an additional financial burden for the team, they provide little value and are grossly overpayed. Very high admin fees, adding overhead and other charges, it amounts to more than 42%, making many projects unviable. Toxic culture, favoritism. HR is not interested in employees, very high turnover rate. Little possibility of promotions. People who work well are overexploited, while bad workers get no repercussions. Very high organization cost but it's not reflected on key employees salaries.

Esplora altre recensioni su World Resources Institute

5,0
5 mag 2026
Dipendente anonimo
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

Great place to work - wonderful colleagues

Svantaggi

Structure does not always meet individual needs

4,0
7 mag 2026
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

Mission-driven work - Smart , friendly and passionate colleagues - Global impact - Collaborative culture - Strong reputation — Flexible / progressive work environment - Innovation-oriented Diverse international perspective A leadership that cares: the global leadership stepped in when U.S. funding was unexpectedly canceled, providing financial support for several programs for a few months to give teams time to secure new funding sources.

Svantaggi

Resource constraints affecting efficiency: working with limited staffing and budgets sometimes made it challenging to execute projects efficiently Compensation compared to the private sector: salaries are noticeably lower than for private-sector roles, which is especially challenging in a city like NYC. Project direction influenced by funding priorities: I noticed that donor and grant priorities often shaped the direction of projects. Career progression tied to funding cycles: advancement opportunities often depended on program funding rather than purely on performance.

Vedi recensioni per: Utile|Valutazione|Data|Tutto