Passa al contenutoPassa al piè di pagina
  • Lavori
  • Aziende
  • Stipendi
  • Per le aziende

      Migliora la tua carriera

      Scopri le tue potenzialità di guadagno, trova lavori da sogno e condividi approfondimenti su lavoro e vita privata in forma anonima.

      employer cover photo
      employer logo
      employer logo

      Amazon

      Azienda coinvolta

      Chi siamo
      Recensioni
      Stipendi e benefit
      Lavori
      Colloqui
      Colloqui
      Ricerche correlate: Recensioni su Amazon | Offerte di lavoro di Amazon | Stipendi di Amazon | Benefit di Amazon
      Colloqui di AmazonColloqui per Software Development Engineer presso AmazonColloquio di Amazon


      Glassdoor

      • Chi siamo
      • Contattaci

      Aziende

      • Account Business gratuito
      • Spazio per le aziende
      • Blog per le aziende

      Informazioni

      • Aiuto
      • Linee guida
      • Condizioni d'uso
      • Privacy e scelte pubblicitarie
      • Non vendere né condividere le mie informazioni
      • Strumento per l'accettazione dei cookie

      Lavora con noi

      • Inserzionisti
      • Carriere
      Scarica l'app

      • Cerca:
      • Aziende
      • Lavori
      • Località

      Copyright © 2008-2026. Glassdoor LLC. "Glassdoor," "Worklife Pro," "Bowls" e il relativo logo sono marchi registrati di Glassdoor LLC.

      Aziende seguite

      Non lasciarti sfuggire opportunità e informazioni privilegiate seguendo le aziende dove vorresti lavorare.

      Ricerche di lavoro

      Ricevi suggerimenti e aggiornamenti personalizzati avviando le tue ricerche.

      Colloquio per Software Development Engineer

      20 dic 2013
      Dipendente anonimo
      Seattle, WA
      Offerta accettata
      Esperienza positiva
      Colloquio difficile

      Candidatura

      Ho presentato la mia candidatura tramite l'università. La procedura ha richiesto 2 mesi. Ho sostenuto un colloquio presso Amazon (Seattle, WA) nel mese di dic 2013

      Colloquio

      Amazon attends the career fair at our University every semester and the have a couple of interview with a few selected candidates and if they pass they are invited to Seattle. This time I instead got a email to take the programming challenge. A weeks time was given to submit the code. The challenge itself was for 2 hours. It had three questions and all you had to do is write the code (there is no compilation), explain it and also add relevant comments. The questions weren't extraordinarily tough or anything. If you have sound logic and a good grasp of data structures you should be okay. 2 weeks later I got an email to attend an onsite interview. The whole process of scheduling a onsite took almost a month. I've heard that it usually doesn't take that long but they probably had many people interviewing. I flew out on a Thursday and was accommodated in a nice hotel quite close to the headquarters. The interview was scheduled to begin at 12:00PM. I made my way to the office and after all of us who had interviews assembled (around 40) we were given temp IDs and taken to a large room with many tables. They asked us to sit in groups of 4 at a table and grab a bite to eat. In a few minutes our interviewers came and joined and everyone had a nice informal chat. After half an hour, names of interviewers and and those people who they will interview were called out. We were taken to our respective rooms and the interview started. As is with many other reviews here, I am not at liberty to disclose what they asked me during the interview. But make sure that you have spent time sitting and writing code by hand on paper or better yet, on a whiteboard. Cracking the coding interview was the only thing I referred to. Solve the book yourself and towards the last chapters you'll realize that breaking down difficult problem comes naturally. I had four back to back interviews. All technical with quite a large amount of coding involved. There were a few random HR questions but mainly coding. There were 2-4 programming questions in each round. One has to explain the logic, write the code and explain his/her logic, prove that the code works run test cases and be ready to tell him/her/them how you would scale that code up in case they ask you. There was no pre defined level to the order of difficulty, I found the first three equally intensive and the fourth one very hard. More stress cannot be laid on the following fact - "Strict proper coding is of paramount importance". Just scribbling stuff, writing algorithms will not help you. You are expected to know your stuff. Proper function definitons, variable names, pointer usage (if c/c++). When you test your function make sure that you have thought about EVERY SINGLE edge case under the Sun. You might think that you have covered them all but beware. If I say every possibilty under the sun, I mean under the Sun not only on Earth but also under the sun on Jupiter, Saturn, moon etc. I got stuck at a point where I didn't even have a single line of code on the board. The interviewer did give me a hint after a couple of requests. But be sure that you have thought out (aloud) every other possibility. There is no greater sin that not knowing what space and time complexities are and how to figure out what they are for the algorithm you have come up with. We were done by 5 in the evening on a Friday and I had the offer on Monday. Good luck to anyone reading this!

      Domande di colloquio [1]

      Domanda 1

      Worry about recursion and different types of trees.
      Rispondi alla domanda
      5

      Altre recensioni di colloqui per Software Development Engineer presso Amazon

      Colloquio per Software Development Engineer

      17 giu 2026
      Candidato anonimo a colloquio
      Offerta rifiutata
      Esperienza positiva
      Colloquio facile

      Candidatura

      Ho sostenuto un colloquio presso Amazon

      Colloquio

      Surprisingly easy — I expected tougher questions, but the coding round felt more like a warm-up. The main challenge was a DSA problem about counting islands in a 2D grid, which led to a discussion on DFS versus BFS and handling large grids. Funny enough, I had revisited that exact type of question while prepping on PracHub, which made me feel more confident. The interview wrapped up with a behavioral round, and I accepted an offer, but ultimately decided to decline it for another opportunity. Overall, it was a smooth experience.

      Domande di colloquio [1]

      Domanda 1

      Number of Islands — given a 2D grid of '1's (land) and '0's (water), count the number of connected islands. Walk through DFS vs BFS, and discuss how to avoid revisiting cells (in-place mutation vs visited set) and what changes if the grid is huge and must stream from disk.
      Rispondi alla domanda

      Colloquio per Software Development Engineer

      3 giu 2026
      Candidato anonimo a colloquio
      Nessuna offerta
      Esperienza positiva
      Colloquio difficile

      Candidatura

      Ho sostenuto un colloquio presso Amazon

      Colloquio

      It started with an OA, and then after a few weeks, I got invited to four rounds of interviews: technical and behavioral at 3 of the 4, and behavioral only at one.

      Domande di colloquio [1]

      Domanda 1

      Questions related to leadership principles
      Rispondi alla domanda

      Colloquio per Software Development Engineer

      23 giu 2026
      Candidato anonimo a colloquio
      Calgary, AB
      Nessuna offerta
      Esperienza positiva
      Colloquio nella media

      Candidatura

      Ho presentato la mia candidatura online. Ho sostenuto un colloquio presso Amazon (Calgary, AB) nel mese di giu 2026

      Colloquio

      Online Assessment is the first step in the process. I didn’t have an HR phone screening and went straight to the OA after applying. It was sent to me about a week after I submitted my application.

      Domande di colloquio [1]

      Domanda 1

      The first question is LeetCode style algorithms question, and the second question gives a full stack repo (choice of Java, NodeJS, or Django) and asks to solve a backend issue which is causing a bug in the frontend. Unit tests must pass to pass the second question. You can run both backend/frontend indivdually or together
      Rispondi alla domanda