1st Round TPI: Had a technical phone round which overall was positive and the problem was a leetcode medium but the expectation was to understand my thought process. I did well here and had a working solution and also explained how I would go about optimizing the same. Virtual Onsite: This was a total of four rounds and below is my experience- 1. Coding Round 1 - A LC hard problem which was one page long, it took me about 15 minutes to just read and understand the problem and was left with just another 25-30 to solve the problem. There were no hints no guidance, it felt like a one way interview which was particularly setup to fail and I failed but never stopped trying. 2. Coding Round 2 - A LC medium problem where the interviewer explained the problem and the data was formatted in tables so I had to extract the data into a format that would help me solve the problem and I had the flexibility on that. I came up with the input and was able to solve the problem but was running into some syntax issues due to casting and since the platform used is hackerrank I could not debug through in the given time but I did go back to see the LC solution and know that the solution would have worked, also explained the optimization of the same. 3. Manger Round - This is subjective and I think the conversation here was really good and I enjoyed talking to the HM. 4. System Design - This is also subjective to what the interviewers perceive but overall think this went well and the solution I had provided was definitely solving the problem at hand. I was overall disappointed with the coding rounds and do not understand what I was being tested for definitely not coding skills as the problem was just not fair enough for solving in 45 minutes. I am pretty confident even the interviewer would not be able to solve it in 45 mins.