Initial phone screen with Recruiter was actually enjoyable. Then came the coding interview. The recruiter provided a lot of good information about the process, but some of the advice provided was misleading. Coding interview was challenging - the interviewer's accent made the conversation very hard to understand.
Applied online. Received a recruiter screen within two weeks covering background and role fit. Followed by a technical phone screen with coding (LeetCode medium-hard, arrays/graphs). Then a virtual onsite with 4 rounds: 2 coding, 1 ML system design (recommendation/ranking system), and 1 behavioral. Interviewers were professional and gave time to ask questions. Results communicated within a week post-onsite.
Ho sostenuto un colloquio presso Meta (Londra, Inghilterra)
Colloquio
First stage was a screen round with behavioral and 2 leetcodes, one medium one hard, 15-17 min each. If selected, loop is 4-6 interviews. 2 desgin, 2 coding, 1 behavioral.
Domande di colloquio [1]
Domanda 1
idiotic questions that can't be answered in depth in 35 minutes design, like "your solution isn't going to work, how will you handle it?" yea no sht this is a baseline bro, wait 15 seconds and ill talk about the optimal one.
Ho presentato la mia candidatura tramite un selezionatore. Ho sostenuto un colloquio presso Meta (Londra, Inghilterra)
Colloquio
Standard Meta process.
1. Recruiter Call
2. Screening Call
3. Onsite Calls -4 rounds (2 coding, 1 ML design, 1 behavioral)
Interviews were all nice except for behavioral. (wouldn't hurt to speak anything apart from okay-okay)
