Not worth it - Recensione dipendente - Claims Analyst presso Adecco

1,0
22 ott 2019
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

easy 500 a week flexible schedule

Svantaggi

You should know, that technically it is not FULL time because you are required to take 30 min lunch break every day without pay. So that is 37.5 hours a week You should also know you are being micromanaged. Every move you make on the computer and the floor is being watched by "management" You are sitting at a desk for 7.5 hours. If you're not at your desk and you want to go to the bathroom or get water or for a 15 min break you are to punch in a code for that on the phone on your desk. Everything is being looked at by this boss lady from Canada who visits once or twice a month. There is a lot of favoritism by the team leads. They just want someone who is quite and puts in their numbers. They are using you.

Esplora altre recensioni su Adecco

5,0
23 giu 2026
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

Easy interview process, fair pay, good remote work

Svantaggi

contract was short term, which was okay for me but might not be what everyone wants

1,0
27 mar 2026
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

Onboarding for new hires was smooth

Svantaggi

My experience with Adecco Staffing Agency reflects a significant disconnect between the expectations set during onboarding and the reality of assignment execution. There appears to be a consistent misalignment between candidate skill sets and the roles they are placed into, which not only undermines performance but also creates unnecessary inefficiencies for both the employee and the client organization. Assignments are often presented without full transparency regarding scope, schedule, or operational requirements, resulting in frequent adjustments that disrupt workflow continuity and personal planning. Additionally, there is a notable deficiency in accurate and timely reporting. Communication regarding assignment details, schedule changes, and performance expectations lacks consistency and clarity. This creates ambiguity in accountability and limits the employee’s ability to effectively manage deliverables. From a process standpoint, this reflects weak coordination and insufficient control mechanisms within their staffing and reporting systems. Most concerning is the apparent lack of advocacy for the employee. A staffing agency should function as an intermediary that ensures alignment between employer needs and employee capabilities while also safeguarding fair treatment and clear communication. In this case, there is a perception that employee concerns—particularly those related to schedule changes, workload expectations, and workplace conditions—are not adequately addressed or escalated. This ultimately results in a work environment that feels transactional rather than supportive, with limited consideration for employee well-being or long-term success.

Vedi recensioni per: Utile|Valutazione|Data|Tutto