Worst hiring-and-interviewing practices ever- for menial, tedious jobs. - Recensione dipendente - Customer Service Representative presso Adecco

1,0
4 mar 2014
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

They set a perfect example of how automated hiring and recruiting tactics drive away top talent and should be turned out to pasture. Oh, and I did get a little customer service position out of them, which I was promised would be a stepping stone to something better that they could find for me. Which they didn't. Glad I left when I did.

Svantaggi

Everything else. It took like a month and hours on top of hours to go through a whole slew of ridiculous tests- all to get a job answering a phone! Also, they treat recruits really rudely, as if your time and efforts aren't worth anything. They don't communicate at all and leave you hanging about whether you have/have not been hired for weeks at a time. Since it is a staffing agency I am half-tempted to tell their clients as a courtesy that it is Adecco which is preventing them from getting good hires. This company is only worth bothering with if you are desperate for any job just to get you through.

Esplora altre recensioni su Adecco

5,0
23 giu 2026
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

Easy interview process, fair pay, good remote work

Svantaggi

contract was short term, which was okay for me but might not be what everyone wants

1,0
27 mar 2026
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

Onboarding for new hires was smooth

Svantaggi

My experience with Adecco Staffing Agency reflects a significant disconnect between the expectations set during onboarding and the reality of assignment execution. There appears to be a consistent misalignment between candidate skill sets and the roles they are placed into, which not only undermines performance but also creates unnecessary inefficiencies for both the employee and the client organization. Assignments are often presented without full transparency regarding scope, schedule, or operational requirements, resulting in frequent adjustments that disrupt workflow continuity and personal planning. Additionally, there is a notable deficiency in accurate and timely reporting. Communication regarding assignment details, schedule changes, and performance expectations lacks consistency and clarity. This creates ambiguity in accountability and limits the employee’s ability to effectively manage deliverables. From a process standpoint, this reflects weak coordination and insufficient control mechanisms within their staffing and reporting systems. Most concerning is the apparent lack of advocacy for the employee. A staffing agency should function as an intermediary that ensures alignment between employer needs and employee capabilities while also safeguarding fair treatment and clear communication. In this case, there is a perception that employee concerns—particularly those related to schedule changes, workload expectations, and workplace conditions—are not adequately addressed or escalated. This ultimately results in a work environment that feels transactional rather than supportive, with limited consideration for employee well-being or long-term success.

Vedi recensioni per: Utile|Valutazione|Data|Tutto