Too much work for a recruiter - Recensione dipendente - Recruiter presso Adecco

1,0
11 feb 2025
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

Nothing great about this corporate company

Svantaggi

1. Phones ring like constantly and you are the only recruiter 2. So much admin work you can’t concentrate on recruiting 3. Pay is below your work needed 4. They took out the bonus structure so example for 50 employees you hire that continue to work it goes to the branch first to make the revenue then you’ll get your cut which is about $100 every 3 months 4. Management has no idea what they are doing all they do is sell while you work endlessly off filling in 80 orders by yourself

Esplora altre recensioni su Adecco

5,0
23 giu 2026
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

Easy interview process, fair pay, good remote work

Svantaggi

contract was short term, which was okay for me but might not be what everyone wants

1,0
27 mar 2026
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

Onboarding for new hires was smooth

Svantaggi

My experience with Adecco Staffing Agency reflects a significant disconnect between the expectations set during onboarding and the reality of assignment execution. There appears to be a consistent misalignment between candidate skill sets and the roles they are placed into, which not only undermines performance but also creates unnecessary inefficiencies for both the employee and the client organization. Assignments are often presented without full transparency regarding scope, schedule, or operational requirements, resulting in frequent adjustments that disrupt workflow continuity and personal planning. Additionally, there is a notable deficiency in accurate and timely reporting. Communication regarding assignment details, schedule changes, and performance expectations lacks consistency and clarity. This creates ambiguity in accountability and limits the employee’s ability to effectively manage deliverables. From a process standpoint, this reflects weak coordination and insufficient control mechanisms within their staffing and reporting systems. Most concerning is the apparent lack of advocacy for the employee. A staffing agency should function as an intermediary that ensures alignment between employer needs and employee capabilities while also safeguarding fair treatment and clear communication. In this case, there is a perception that employee concerns—particularly those related to schedule changes, workload expectations, and workplace conditions—are not adequately addressed or escalated. This ultimately results in a work environment that feels transactional rather than supportive, with limited consideration for employee well-being or long-term success.

Vedi recensioni per: Utile|Valutazione|Data|Tutto