Great place to work - Recensione dipendente - Software Engineer II presso GoDaddy

5,0
14 apr 2025
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

This company is a great mix of big tech company and small enough to still feel connected to the mission and other employees. I think the compensation is fair for the job, stock options and yearly bonuses make a big difference in total comp. On-call rotation is fair and not overly demanding. Overall the company culture is very welcoming and open to new ideas and experiments.

Svantaggi

It seems like the company is not prioritizing effort to have teams meet in person (ever). There are some year end parties but it is company wide and only available to employees who are already in the area. If you are not in one of the major hubs do not expect to meet your co-workers face-to-face.

avatar
Risposta di GoDaddy
1y
Thank you for taking the time to write a review. We encourage our teammates to live passionately and provide honest feedback that will help us grow as a company.

Esplora altre recensioni su GoDaddy

5,0
16 giu 2026
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

Great company to work for. Annual bonus, ESPP, annual equity. The comppany really cares abuot its employees.

Svantaggi

No cons come to mind

1,0
15 giu 2026
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

The people. Many talented, hardworking employees genuinely cared about helping customers and supporting one another. I gained valuable experience in customer service, website consulting, digital marketing, project management, and cross-functional collaboration. My coworkers consistently went above and beyond despite increasing demands and shrinking resources.

Svantaggi

High turnover, declining morale, and a culture that increasingly asked employees to do more with less. Over the years, benefits and employee perks were gradually reduced while workloads and expectations continued to grow. Many employees took on responsibilities well beyond their job descriptions, including training, coaching, mentoring, quality review, side-by-sides, and leadership functions without corresponding compensation, title changes, or advancement opportunities. Career growth often felt unclear and inconsistent, leaving many employees feeling that hard work and additional responsibility were not rewarded. Leadership frequently emphasized that employees were replaceable rather than investing in retention, development, and institutional knowledge. This created an environment where many experienced and highly capable employees felt undervalued, disengaged, and ultimately chose to leave. Many female employees expressed frustration with what they perceived as inconsistent promotion practices. It was common to see highly capable women taking on additional responsibilities such as training, mentoring, coaching, quality review, and leadership functions without formal advancement, while others appeared to move into leadership roles more quickly. Whether intentional or not, this created a perception that advancement opportunities were not always based on contribution, performance, or demonstrated leadership. The company often spoke about valuing employees while simultaneously reducing benefits, eliminating perks, increasing workloads, and expecting employees to absorb additional responsibilities. Over time, the gap between leadership messaging and employee experience became increasingly difficult to ignore.

Vedi recensioni per: Utile|Valutazione|Data|Tutto