No Growth Opportunities - Recensione dipendente - Business Analyst presso Innodata

2,0
1 gen 2019
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

There is multiple level of hierarchy which definitely helps an employee understand the corporate hierarchy in a better way, specially if he/she comes from a small organisation. The office infrastructure is good with a neat and clean environment.

Svantaggi

There is no growth opportunity for technical people, neither in terms of learning nor monetary. The salary hike is very poor and not at par with the lowest trend in the industry. This is a KPO/BPO and do not confuse it with an IT company. They are not in trend with using the latest technologies which are available and are being used by other companies now-days. Most of the time (90%) you have to work on the Change Request and there is no new project. The TL/PM does not support their team members at all. There is no work-life balance as there is production department and you have to continuously support them be whatever, and whenever you ask for a break you will be insulted for no reason. Though you may have many leaves or if you haven't taken any leaves in a couple of months you will always be discouraged to take any leave. The senior management make false commitments to clients without consulting the back-end team which results in creating undue pressure and increases the workload.

Esplora altre recensioni su Innodata

5,0
2 feb 2026
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

Great place to work with consistent communication.

Svantaggi

Days can get repetitive and dry

2,0
12 apr 2026
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

Some flexibility Work from home

Svantaggi

One thing I really didn’t enjoy about the guidance: our client sets a bench mark of having 85% “utilization”. Basically stating that of the 40 hours worked, 85% of that must be in “production code”, so about 35ish hours a week. The rest of the time can be spent reviewing emails, guidelines, etc. The project manager basically had management tell people that they could be 2.5 hours in other codes, and about 37.5 should be in production. If this is a decision from a client, then great, but it seemed to me the project manager was just trying to get every little bit of production possible out of people. I’m under the impression that if employees are treated like people and given proper breaks, the quality of work will be way better. If you force them to sit for 7.5 hours or a 8 hour day in front of a screen, the quality will be worse. The client says it’s 85% utilization, so why are we telling our employees they need to be in production for 37.5 hours out of the day? It just seems dishonest. Data annotation work can be tough and some of the tasks are repetitive and can take a lot of concentration. Half of the admin, forgets what it’s like to work in the queues, and drive these numbers blindly. Meanwhile, half of their job consists of chatting on teams all day.

Vedi recensioni per: Utile|Valutazione|Data|Tutto