C-Suite needs to get on board with reality - Recensione dipendente - Dipendente anonimo presso LinkedIn

1,0
23 lug 2024
Dipendente anonimo
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

The culture and LinkedIn used to be great, and you really can't go wrong with Microsoft Stock as part of compensation

Svantaggi

LinkedIn Executives don't seem to have any clear sense of strategy or how to help LinkedIn grow. They're constantly looking for new shiny things and have moved far away from helping professionals succeed in their careers. Just look at the AI-created help articles and Games as examples of the lack of clear focus and strategy - not to mention the Feed becoming less and less professional. Due to this lack of direction, people are being asked to work harder, longer, and for less pay. (That's right, because the company isn't doing as well within the context of larger Microsoft, LinkedIn is cutting down significantly on raises, promos, and stock refreshes. Many people hit their 4 year cliff, and due to a lack of additional stock see a ~30% hit in their total annual compensation. It's incredibly uninspiring and de-motivating). Finally, HR is a joke. There are male leaders who are notorious for not working well with women, and HR does nothing about the fact that all of the women under these leaders quit, are managed out, or leave. Managers are being encouraged to performance manage out more employees so the company can avoid layoffs. Given the current trajectory, it's possible that LinkedIn will plateau, if not decline, in the next 5 years.

Esplora altre recensioni su LinkedIn

5,0
19 mag 2026
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

great company with amazing people involved

Svantaggi

little too small to have industry wide research breakthroughs

3,0
21 feb 2026
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

-Control your schedule -Office environment is great -Teammates are nice and helpful

Svantaggi

-Customer Success metrics lack clear ownership and actionable levers. Many CSMs do not have direct control over the outcomes they are measured against, and success narratives are often based on isolated or non-replicable examples rather than scalable processes. -Microsoft’s increased influence over LinkedIn has led to tighter promotion structures and more limited compensation growth pathways. -Product value within the LTS portfolio is inconsistent. LinkedIn Learning struggles with perceived differentiation and impact, while Recruiter’s market position relies heavily on legacy dominance rather than clear ongoing innovation or customer value expansion. -Metric design and performance management frameworks were created without a strong operational understanding of the CSM role, resulting in accountability for outcomes that CSMs cannot directly influence. -While many CSMs share these concerns, there is limited upward feedback or structured challenge to leadership regarding metric design and role effectiveness, which limits opportunities for meaningful reform. They prefer to lick the boots of senior leaders rather than tell AV and his team how they actually feel and see progress to better, more impactful metrics. For individuals who are comfortable with high call volumes (10+ customer interactions per week) and performance metrics that are influenced significantly by external factors rather than direct role ownership, LinkedIn LTS Customer Success can be a suitable environment.

3
Vedi recensioni per: Utile|Valutazione|Data|Tutto