Contacted by a recruiter. Started with a phone call with the recruiter, asked me questions about my recent projects and work experience. Why am I changing my present comapny if it's really good. Answered them well and they moved forward to the next step. (Phone Screen) Phone Screen was scheduled on time (as per my availability) and the interviewer was a little late which is totally ok. I was asked about myself, my experience, my projects and minute details from the resume. Then I was questioned about ML basics and why am I choosing a particular technique over other. Followed by a coding challenge. I answered that really well, lacked a bit in the first few minutes but eventually landed up with 2 different approaches for the same problem( I got hints here and there). Long Story short, I completed the coding challenge (Which I later checked the solution was accurate) and then I asked a few questions to the interviewer about LinkedIn, the culture, the daily life etc. Answered all my questions really politely and we ended the call. Final Update: They didn't move forward with my application (This was shocking honestly) I didn't see this coming from the way I coded the questions and answered everything else well.

Phone screen then onsite. Phone screen: 1 coding question and 1 question regarding precision/recall. Onsite (6 rounds): 2 coding, 1 product design, 1 ML theory, 1 lunch, 1 behavioral. They asked a lot of questions in ML theory round. Recruiter's feedback: 1. I could not answer "what is '1' in F1 measure?" 2. I just describe superficially. Actually, I started thorough descriptions at the very beginning but the interviewer stopped me. Seemingly, the interviewers are biased toward people from Statistics or a certain country.