Ho presentato la mia candidatura online. La procedura ha richiesto 2 settimane. Ho sostenuto un colloquio presso LinkedIn (Mountain View, CA) nel mese di feb 2016
Colloquio
Recruiter called, they were very professional.
Phone screen - 2 questions.
Onsite - 6 rounds (2 technical coding rounds - one basic question about merging interval, other one about tree)(1 design interview)(1 craftsmanship)(2 general behavioral / technical talk)
Rejected after 7 days of wait.
Domande di colloquio [1]
Domanda 1
started with phone screen, it was easy. I did great in all the 6 interviews except one interview where the interviewer asked me to write code about graph / tree. I explained topological sort but she didn't know what Topological sort and Graph Indegree / outdegree were, she had a laptop which she kept typing in, i did excellent in my other interviews but this one she kept pushing me to the solution she had in the laptop which she thought was the most optimal solution.
The company is great but I kinda felt weird where people with 14 years of experience are graded by people with 2 years of experience.
I would recommend increasing the coding round and decreasing the general sessions, this way you can't get rejected by one bad interviewer.
Ho sostenuto un colloquio presso LinkedIn (Sunnyvale, CA)
Colloquio
Recruiter emailed me for exploring interview. Then, I was invited to a phone screening interview.
I was asked to implement LFU similar data structure. I've never implemented that before. I've done with LRU though. It was very difficult to me to come up with appropriate solution on site.
Domande di colloquio [1]
Domanda 1
LFU-like question was asked, which was very difficult for me to solve.
Ho presentato la mia candidatura tramite un selezionatore. La procedura ha richiesto 4 settimane. Ho sostenuto un colloquio presso LinkedIn nel mese di lug 2025
Colloquio
3 DSA rounds ( leetcode hard ) + 2 system design rounds + 1 managerial round focussed on projects and behavioural questions. Process was well organised in terms of scheduling.
The interviewers seemed rigid in evaluating candidates by narrow checklists rather than engineering depth. Feedback reflected a bias towards specific solution paths - even when alternate valid approaches were discussed clearly and with tradeoffs.
The interview culture also gave little space for collaborative discussion; it felt more like evaluative than explorative, especially in architecture rounds. I was also penalised for choosing a simple, scalable design before incrementally adding complexity.
Advice to Management"
Staff+ roles demand open mindedness and an appreciation for diverse design perspectives. Encourage interviewers to listen with curiosity rather than just matching against predefined answers.
Domande di colloquio [1]
Domanda 1
Leetcode hard questions and couple of system design questions
Get contacted for a Silicon Valley position, finished screening and onsite (5 rounds). Have not heard back from anybody after 25 days, even after I followed up with the recruiter at the 14 day mark.